Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 45

Thread: How far away is the horizon??

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Armstrong Creek, Qld
    Posts
    8,777
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Isn't it true that you can see "over" the horizon for a short distance as light rays are affected by the Earths gravity & therefore bend? Probably different on "Discworld"

  2. #22
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Heathcote (in "The Shire")
    Posts
    5,348
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Saitch View Post
    Isn't it true that you can see "over" the horizon for a short distance as light rays are affected by the Earths gravity & therefore bend? Probably different on "Discworld"
    Not affected by gravity, but affected by refraction through the atmosphere. If I remember right when the apparent sun is just about set the actual sun is already below the horizon, and only visible due to the refraction.
    When I was surveying we had to correct observations to stars for refraction, and the amount varies with temp and pressure (these affect atmospheric density)


    Martyn

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Armstrong Creek, Qld
    Posts
    8,777
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Martyn
    I could be horribly wrong here but I was of the opinion & training that light is affected by gravity. I'm in the surveying proffesion & in the 70's when using G8 Geodimeters, which could measure 80 + kilometres, I'm sure there was a formula to calculate curvature of the LASER caused by gravity. Surely light must be affected by gravity otherwise there'd be no black holes.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    640
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Martyn and Saitch,

    You are both right. Both atmospheric refraction and gravity can influence the final path of light.

    Atmospheric refraction as the light travels though different air densities can cause it to bend - hold a pencil in a glass of water and you'll see what I mean. Similarly, spear fishermen standing in the shallows never aim at the fish, they alway aim slightly short of the fish.

    In Antarctica I've watched mountains hundreds of miles away that are not possible to see due to the curvature of the earth appear and disappear as I've been standing on the ground. This is due to light being refracted in layers of cold air near the surface. (I've also seen Fisher Massif (a large blocky mountain at the end of the Lambert Glacier, Antarctica) reflected upside down in the sky due to total internal reflection but I digress...)

    As for gravity though, light will not not be bent by gravity per se. According to Einstein's theory, space is "bent" by gravity, thus anything travelling in a straight line (light) will appear "bend" relative to a distant observer (but not to the object moving) as it travels through the bent space.

    This theory was proved early last century when during a total solar eclipse, light from a star which should have been obscured by the sun's disc (when measured by the apparent distance to other nearby stars) was visible just beside the sun. The light, travelling in a straight line through space bent by the sun appears to be moved.


    More recently, Hubble took a fabulous image of the same effect on a massive scale - light from a quasar and a galazy behind a massive black hole object (black holes have gravity so strong it sucks space in on itself) bending space so that the light heading out in slightly different directions is focussed by the "bent" space producing five separate images of them are apparent. Mind blowing stuff.

    NASA - Hubble Captures A "Five-Star" Rated Gravitational Lens

  5. #25
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,538
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yes, light is affected by gravity as in the prvious post. But the effect is too small to be observed on earth and would not be a factor in surveying, except possibly for some star shots involving light rays passing close to the sun.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    640
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Good point JD, I am wondering whether even with the best most accurate laser you could still couldn't measure it as both the emitter and the sender are in the same patch of "bent" space-time - i.e. in my diagram above imagine you were on the surface of the sun surveying with sub pico-mm accuracy. the laser beam would still be the same distance from the surface.

    I've just read that there was to be a satellite launched to measure the effect from the earth as there's a theory called frame dragging, where as the body rotates, it pulls the curved space-time with it.

    My brain hurts.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    brighton, brisbane
    Posts
    33,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    With all of our equations, theories, and navigational extracts, I defy anyone to swim to it. Or sail to it, for that matter, Bob
    I’m pretty sure the dinosaurs died out when they stopped gathering food and started having meetings to discuss gathering food

    A bookshop is one of the only pieces of evidence we have that people are still thinking

  8. #28
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Heathcote (in "The Shire")
    Posts
    5,348
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    Yes, light is affected by gravity as in the prvious post. But the effect is too small to be observed on earth and would not be a factor in surveying, except possibly for some star shots involving light rays passing close to the sun.

    John
    Not much of a problem, most stars are too hard to see during the day.


    Martyn

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Padbury
    Posts
    818
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bob10 View Post
    With all of our equations, theories, and navigational extracts, I defy anyone to swim to it. Or sail to it, for that matter, Bob

    Quite right,
    By the time i swam to the horizion i think there would not be an earth left

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    South Yundreup,WA.
    Posts
    7,468
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The main factor is m above true sea level. Standing at the waters edge is not necessarily true sea level. Dose get very confusing unless you know exactly how far above sea level you are.
    For searching we work on a few generic distances.
    Inland more than 60kms, usually you are over 100m above sea level, so provided you can see the horizon to start with we work on 20 mile.
    If on a hill, you can see significantly more.
    In a plane this increases vastly.
    However for us the horizon is only a reference point and does not have a lot of values apart from looking for signals such as smoke or mirror refraction.
    At the beach standing at the high water mark we generally work at a height above sea level of around 5 metres. Then things like swell also come into play as well as clarity, sea mist, cloud, haze, glare etc.
    Maximum visible distance to the horizon is calculated on an ideal day.
    2011 Discovery 4 TDV6
    2009 DRZ400E Suzuki
    1956 & 1961 P4 Rover (project)
    1976 SS Torana (project - all cash donations or parts accepted)
    2003 WK Holden Statesman
    Departed
    2000 Defender Extreme: Shrek (but only to son)
    84 RR (Gone) 97 Tdi Disco (Gone)
    98 Ducati 900SS Gone & Missed

    Facta Non Verba

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!