Who remembers this thread?
I do, And I actually asked about it today.
Now, my GFs father tends to explain things in a roundabout sort of way, he's one of those rambling academic types but a nice bloke

So.
1. He's talking about starting at the bottom of a hill, no run up.
2. He quite willingly admits he could be totally wrong
3. He was convinced by the idea that if a person struggles to walk up an incline then a vehicle shouldn't do that much better.
I showed him the unimog video which he was quite astounded by, although the final one showing 110% incline he dismissed as the front wheels ramp over the end before the rear wheels get to the climb.
What he was essentially talking about was that he believes it is very difficult for vehicles to have a high enough coefficient of friction to scale inclines of a flat surface.
He hadn't considered tyre deflation to increase the footprint to gain more traction, and I reminded him that when us humans walk up things, we're taking one foot off the ground in order to move forwards, so it's not an apples and apples comparison of a vehicle that should be keeping 4 wheels providing drive on the ground.
Add to that, I mentioned that breaking traction isn't necessarily an indication of failure to climb such an incline.
He is also basing this off what he had read, but when he tried it (with a morris moke mind you

) that 15 degrees was the limit.
So, there you have it.
Tombie, time to dust off that 40* hill climb video, and it's time for me to find a suitable hill climb

Bookmarks