I have very mixed views re this. As a tradie, post grad engineer, wksp manager and technical integrity supervisor not to mention many friends and aquaintences who are also tradies I get torn between appys needing to learn and being charged/charging full rate to do it.
On one hand, apprentices are an in house cost as far as I am concerned. I have been known to mention to plumbers/carpenters/electricians that I ring to fix my house, that I know the scope of work well and the work should only take 1 hour (or whatever). I'll only pay one hours labour plus callout! Quite a few defend their use of appys and I reply by suggesting a lower rate for the work performed by the appy. Some actually agree so that's fair.
On the other hand, I take on dozens of appys on a placement roster, but I scrutinise them heavily. I prefer final year or mature students and I allocate them one supervisor each. I also don't shy from plain language assesments...crude workmanship, knowledge deficient, shoddy, lacks attention to detail, poor tool handling and so forth. Very few actually don't want to come back as also insist they are taught stuff so they leave knowing more than they did when they arrived.
Ralph - the benevolent![]()


Reply With Quote






Bookmarks