Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Mechanically injected engine VS all the electronic stuff

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Love it, you just cant beat a direct injection mechanical diesel sometimes. In fact that's wrong, you can't beat one any of the time.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    what vehicle was this in?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The wifes disco.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Would a normal td5 get better mileage given the same conditions?

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    yes, the td5 runs more economically than the tdi right up till you start looking at KM/L diesel (or KM/$) and the fact that the tdi doesnt have to have diesel to run.

    one of the things I love lambasting the gaywagon (and pumas and toyotas and pretty much every poofter posers modern 4x4) over is their woeful economy. Km/L(diesel) my old series and the wifes disco has them beat hands down of course I dont usually tell them at the start that both those vehicles generally run on anything but diesel so while my over all KM/L may actually be worse the cost per KM is almost always in my favor (until you start counting tilt tray KMs as well, then Im screwed again).
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    would a td5 disco have not had the fuel shortage problem due to its range on full tank given the same conditions.

    I agree with what you are saying, but those modern 4wds are making more power per litre and moving heavier vehicles, so maybe those engines are better, just the package and what people expect from them is different.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melrose SA
    Posts
    2,838
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Dave I agree with the sentiment and spirit of the original post
    Personally I would of just carried enough fuel

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I left ippy with a full tank and 100+l in jerries(one from dry refill for the car and 1 spare) in the trailer. for a 1400k w/trailer trip I had considered that more than ample (and was on par to make it back with . It turned into about a 2300K trip with headwinds for more than 1300K of it

    When we decided to return from chinchilla to charleville It was quatering headwinds all the way back , I put about 50l in in roma the wind was bad enough that in sections I wasnt game to hold 5th due to the buffetting of the car and the amount of pedal I was needing to not hold 105kph. It took me more fuel to go back from roma to charleville than it had taken to do charleville- chinchilla

    The way back from charleville was the same quatering headwinds for 700Km

    Peeved me a little bit as the first run out to charleville was pretty good and we averaged near 11l/100 for the trip out and on the first leg back with the same wind blowing as a rear quatering wind and slow traffic (construction works, lots of overloaded road trains) we were on par for probably 8.5-9l/100 I still had over half a tank showing when we hit chinchilla .
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  9. #19
    2stroke Guest
    I did a run to Chinchilla on tuesday night to pick up the son and father in law as that was as close as they could get on a rather long and painful trip back from Rocky on random closed roads. Just headed back out on Saturday to retrieve the rodeo ute they left at the golf club car park. Could easily have fitted a couple more people in if I had known. As long as you don't mind touring around in a Tdi 130 ?
    Oh and funny enough I passed a neat original looking Series 1 LWB with a proper tub and canvas canopy on the back, reckon he must have been sitting on about 100 km/h... respect to him!

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    would a td5 disco have not had the fuel shortage problem due to its range on full tank given the same conditions.

    I agree with what you are saying, but those modern 4wds are making more power per litre and moving heavier vehicles, so maybe those engines are better, just the package and what people expect from them is different.
    not that much better...... from when I was running a td5 its in the order of .5l/100 better in about the same circumstances.

    even if ID had a td5 the extra piffling of economy it gets would still have had the fuel range out the window on this trip.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!