Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Toyota Australia

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Adelaide Hills
    Posts
    13,383
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewGJones View Post
    besides, why give money to people who clearly cannot run a profitable business?
    zing!

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Adelaide Hills
    Posts
    13,383
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Sparksdisco View Post
    I belive in adapt or die.

    Australia clearly can not compete in the manafacturing sector so we need to adapt to survive.
    100% agree

    australia for the most part cannot compete on a global scale and change is needed.

  3. #13
    mikehzz Guest
    The only reason they aren't profitable is that they aren't allowed to pay the workers Thai wage rates coupled with the current $AU. If you send your manufacturing expertise offshore then you run the risk of getting in the poo if the offshore interest withholds from you for whatever reason. Governments of any flavour regularly protect important industries so that the country maintains its capability in that area of expertise. The US heavily protects its farming. If you don't protect to some degree then you leave yourself vulnerable to other countries doing the wrong thing and holding you over a barrel. Toyota aren't dumb dumb's who can't run a business.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Illawarra
    Posts
    2,508
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Sparks n eevo please understand.
    We are competitive in manufacturing and in the case of steel are actually as cheap or cheaper than china. Problem is there is no fantasy level playing field. The chinese govt through its bonus system actually push the cost below what the raw materials and equipment costs to convert ore to steel. Even in oz labour is only 5% of the cost.
    You tell me which is more economical? Sitting a steel mill close to the coal and shipping in the ore(or as originally planned building a sister mill in WA running full ships each way) or in china/ india/japans case shipping in both the ore and coal with the bulk carriers running back empty?
    Is it cheaper or more expensive for Oz, E.U to use 20% less coal per ton of steel than chinese steel? How about environmental benefits? We have extremely low emissions whereas china had to use computer graphics to enable the fireworks to be broadcast.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Transfer pricing is another problem.

    Toyota head office can price vehicles and parts to Australia at a level where Australia will never make a profit. So Aussie makes a loss, Head Office makes a profit that outstrips the Aussie loss and they pay/claim tax in the countries it is most favourable to do so.

    Big fines have resulted from this type of behaviour, but it's very difficult to prove.

  6. #16
    AndrewGJones Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Dougal View Post
    Transfer pricing is another problem.

    Toyota head office can price vehicles and parts to Australia at a level where Australia will never make a profit. So Aussie makes a loss, Head Office makes a profit that outstrips the Aussie loss and they pay/claim tax in the countries it is most favourable to do so.

    Big fines have resulted from this type of behaviour, but it's very difficult to prove.
    Probably really easy to prove, just not easy to find someone with the motivation to take them to task.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!