I should have probably been more specific earlier, it's the older gear that suffers, personally I wouldn't recommend it to anyone, unless what they are using has been specified to be ethanol compatible, too much risk IMO, and performance is noticibly impaired over 95 or 98 RON.
Most of the small stuff isn't up to standards, this is why it suffers, and a lot of gear was made over 10 years ago.
That being said, when I used to run the CB250 (1980) in my buggy, all the brand new lines went hard and cracked (in 2010) it also stuffed the carby-to-block adapters which were brand new at the time ($50 each x2), so they got replaced again and it has only run on 98 since then, with no further issues. I built the whole thing and the only thing we did was run E10 in it, all the damage occurred over 1 weekend.
Damage was:
- Cracked carburettor adaptors x2 (rubber went brittle and broke off the metal)
- Fuel tap seal dissolved (fuel ran out of the tank while it was parked!)
- Fuel line went hard and cracked at the bend, spraying fuel on the motor)
The fuel line was replaced with another bit from the same roll and still remains soft since we stopped using E10.
It also causes no end of problems if rubber perishes and breaks up, causing blockage after blockage, we only just got one of the veteran cars sorted after the neoprene seal in the petrol cap dissolved into the tank (everything else is copper/brass or steel in the system).
Personally unless you KNOW your junk can run ethanol I wouldn't take the risk to save 3 cents per litre.
I wasn't scared off it by talk, it was by experience, we ran it in a BA Falcon all the time.
Cheers
Will




Reply With Quote

Bookmarks