I think you will find that the major manufacturers have been working within these guidelines for a long time. There are still a few who flaunt it such as Tuff Bars but you would have to think that design is time limited.
What I have not seen are the statistics to back up the whole concept. Of the pedestrians/cyclists who are hit by vehicles, how many are hit by vehicles with bullbars. Where is the statical evidence that the injuries are worse.
To my way of thinking, someone hit by a Cruiser with no bullbar travelling at 60km/hr is not going to feel much better than if they had been hit by a Cruiser with a bullbar travelling at 60 km/hr![]()
REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
Storm in a teacup😴
Like above^^^^^^^^
Bars from arb tjm have been meeting those standards for over 10 years
If they didn't make seatbelt laws retrospective can't see them doing it to bb's
Dc
I don't have a problem with push bikes in the burbs around my area , the main problem is in the inner city of Sydney. The riders are on a deathwish, there are dedicated lanes or paths, that are virtually deserted, for them but they insist on riding on the traffic clogged roads?
They then jump the gutter and ride down malls like martin place almost collecting my kids pram, its a big red 2 seater ffs, to then cut back into the traffic on pitt st causing cars to jam on their brakes!
its about the angle of the bar. from all the photos in the link provided, it looks like its trying to push and object up, not down.
im sure most of us have hit more roo's than pedestrians, and when we do hit a roo, do we want to going under the car, or through the windscreen?
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks