Not much in the way of indicator use in any of those vids either!
Cheers, Mick.
Printable View
Not much in the way of indicator use in any of those vids either!
Cheers, Mick.
I said " It is hard to appreciate the distances between cars " ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by goingbush
Regarding the Hilux and how it overtake you, there is not a dispute that he was in the wrong and if you was at the speed limit then even if you was in the left for him to overtake you he will need to drive overt the legal speed limit.
It was not my intention to blame you, perhaps I expressed my way wrong.
My worry was if the police can make the observation that I mentioned and try to put you in trouble and this comment IMO is in line with what the thread was all about.
Regarding the recorded films I just wonder; have to be submitted with the camera or in a DVD?
How it can be proved in court that the original film was not re-edited?
Just a thought.
Cheers
Yeah crazy stuff that's for sure.Quote:
Originally Posted by goingbush
But what you are forgetting - everyone has their own story.
Maybe he has a friend in the car having a heart attack? Or rushing home to a house on fire? Or ate a really bad curry and is about to destroy his favorite jeans?
Every person you see drive past, or anyone walking in the street, everyone has their own personal story.
Maybe he is posting on a forum somewhere saying - 'I was rushing home to my dieing mother and some a-hole reported my driving to the police, now I have a huge fine because someone judged that 15 minutes of my driving career and took it apon themselves to report me without knowing who I am and what my story is'..
Just my thoughts anyway.
Informative reading
What Are The Legal Issues When Using A Dashcam?
and this link:
Taking photographs and other images
Quote:
The Privacy Act and images
69.110 The Privacy Act protects personal information that is held, or collected for inclusion, in a ‘record’. A ‘record’ is defined to include a photograph or other pictorial representation of a person.[133] If an individual’s identity is apparent, or can reasonably be ascertained, from a photograph or other image, then the collection, use and disclosure of that image is covered by the Privacy Act. This extends to video images as well as still photographs. The rest of this chapter uses the term ‘image’ to cover photographs and moving images. All of the privacy principles applicable to the collection and use and disclosure of personal information also will apply to the taking and publication of images.
69.111 As with other forms of personal information, the coverage of images is limited by the scope of the Privacy Act. For example, an image is not covered by the Privacy Act if it was taken by an individual who is acting in their private capacity. The image is also not covered if the image was taken by someone acting on behalf of a small business.[134] Similarly, images taken by a person acting on behalf of a state or territory agency are not covered by the Privacy Act, although they may be covered by a state or territory law.[135]
End of Quote.