I always thought superannuation contributions were tax free.
Am I wrong?
If they are, why shouldn't you pay tax on what you withdraw in your retirement?
I always thought superannuation contributions were tax free.
Am I wrong?
If they are, why shouldn't you pay tax on what you withdraw in your retirement?
Yes and no - where contributions have been made from taxable income - no additional tax is paid - for me in the military - all MY own contributions were paid in after tax contributions. Same when I was in the public servant.
When I into a super fund separate to work I paid in money through salary sacrifice where I paid tax of 15% on contributions rather than the marginal tax rate of about 40%.
I pay the marginal tax rate on my military super payments and will do forever where on my separate fund if I withdraw any of the untaxed component before age 60 I pay tax on that withdrawal but after 60 it is tax free - but I continue to pay tax on my military super payments - so much for looking after servicemen.
I consider it to be my super funded by my contributions but as it paid as a "govt" pension the govt considers it a govt handout like the pension or dole. It was funded by my efforts and is not a freeby.
Garry
REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
While people pay only 15% contribution tax on deposits salary sacrificed pre-(income)tax. You also pay the contribution tax on any interest added to the account every year.
If the "value" of the superannuation balance in your account falls, like it did during the GFC, you don't get any tax rebate for the losses. But you will pay contribution tax on the gains in the balance after a drop, even if it only restores the value of the account before the drop. It was even the case that the ATO was taxing your contributions at the same time as the balance was going backwards.
(e.g. on a 1 July start of year bal of $100,000. which fell to $80,000 because of the GFC and you contributed $10,000, which would have meant a balance of $90,000 less charges at end of year = a loss of $10,000 the ATO still required the $1,500 contribution tax on the deposit, meaning a loss of $11,500 in spite of depositing $10,000. If you were a business investor and that happened, you would have paid no tax and received tax concessions for the $20,000 loss in a subsequent year.)
The argument is therefore that you have paid tax on the same money twice while it is deposited and remains in the account, they shouldn't be taxing it a third time when you withdraw it in retirement.
However if you retire after your preservation age and before age 60 you will pay tax three times on your super.
You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks