Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: drone landing on carrier

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    brighton, brisbane
    Posts
    33,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    A bit off topic , but that hasn't worried me before. Bob [ I was there this night, On Vampire. ]


    The Melbourne-Evans Incident (released 1975) - YouTube
    I’m pretty sure the dinosaurs died out when they stopped gathering food and started having meetings to discuss gathering food

    A bookshop is one of the only pieces of evidence we have that people are still thinking

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Heathcote (in "The Shire")
    Posts
    5,348
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Interesting for an unmanned acft they still had the Flight deck officers (Yellow shirts) giving directions and hand signal to the acft. Hard (or not good practice) to break routine.


    Martyn

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bushie View Post
    Interesting for an unmanned acft they still had the Flight deck officers (Yellow shirts) giving directions and hand signal to the acft. Hard (or not good practice) to break routine.


    Martyn
    There is still a controller of the drone - not in it but still needs to be told to get the drone to the catapault etc no different if there was a pilot onboard. The contoller will either be watching flight deck officer directly or via cameras on the drone.
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    brighton, brisbane
    Posts
    33,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bushie View Post
    Interesting for an unmanned acft they still had the Flight deck officers (Yellow shirts) giving directions and hand signal to the acft. Hard (or not good practice) to break routine.


    Martyn

    I believe the routine is carried on for the operator [ the man with the remote] to be in the loop, and for the deck crew to be comfortable with what is happening. As this develops, they will work their routines to suit. Bob
    I’m pretty sure the dinosaurs died out when they stopped gathering food and started having meetings to discuss gathering food

    A bookshop is one of the only pieces of evidence we have that people are still thinking

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    485
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Reads90 View Post
    When ever I see these sort of things it reminds me of something

    I had a cousin who was in the SAS in the uk and I always remember what he used to tell me.
    And that was if you see something new from the military in the papers or on TV then I am telling you it is not that new. They will say its new but had it for a few years. They won't invent a new weapon and tell the world about it straight if the bat. They keep it to themselves for a bit.
    Don't know how true that is but seems to make sense. So as to keep the advantage against your foes.
    An aquiantance of mine got ambushed a long way into Angola in the ealy 80's. Got lost & missed the helicopter evac. So he walked out, which took him about 3 months iirc. Once he got back to a base in SWA/Namibia he was court martialled on the basis that he must have been colluding with the enemy, to have been in Angola that long without getting killed.
    He was exonerated because his story of E & E was proved when they checked the satellite photos & saw him, where & when he said he was.
    Remember, that's in the early 80's, that a single person could be recognised from a satellite photo!
    It wasn't until the late 90's / early 2000's (iirc) that the media was talking about satellites that could do this.

    On the other hand, an Uncle of mine tells this story; He was escorting some Russian Diplomat types who were being allowed to witness part of a tank exercise some time after WW2. (There had been some top level argument about this as you can imagine, since it was the early part of the Cold War). However, my Uncle states that the Russians were so impressed by the rate of fire achieved by the British tanks (thanks to the newly developed independant targeting system which enabled the commander to lay in & program the next shot before the previous had even been fired) that it completely put them off the idea of starting a shooting war - at the time a very real possibility, apparently.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!