Thank you for the post Bob, HERE is also a good link were shows it global.
Interesting, Bob
20 February 2014 Last updated at 18:53
Share this page
Share this page
EU Commission launches legal action over UK air quality
Comments (570)
By Matt McGrath Environment correspondent, BBC News
Nitrogen dioxide is a by-product of diesel engines
Continue reading the main story Related Stories
The European Commission has launched legal proceedings against the UK for failing to deal with air pollution.
The EU says that levels of nitrogen dioxide, mainly from diesel engines, are "excessive" in many British cities.
The Commission says that this gas can lead to major respiratory illnesses and premature deaths.
Britain was supposed to meet EU limits by 2010, but the government admits that London won't achieve this standard until 2025.
The UK's problem with dirty air stems from the EU's air pollution directive, which came into force in 2008.
It set limits on the the levels of air-borne contaminants, including particulate matter and nitrogen oxides, gases that are produced from the burning of fossil fuels.
Continue reading the main story “Start Quote
The UK has some of the worst NO2 levels in Europe, they're a national disgrace”End Quote Alan Andrews ClientEarth
They are an important element of ground-level ozone, which can damage human health as well as plants and animals.
Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), which in the main is produced by diesel cars and trucks, can inflame the lining of the lungs and lead to respiratory disease.
It is of particular concern to people living near roadways in big cities and those suffering with asthma.
Excess gas
Controlling the amount of this gas in air has proved particularly difficult for the UK.
For the purposes of air pollution, the UK is divided into 43 zones.
Continue reading the main story The invisible killer
- Campaigners say that research shows air pollution causes around 29,000 early deaths in the UK every year
- Across the EU, more than 400,000 people died prematurely in 2010 from air pollution, according to the Commission. As well as deaths, 100 million work days are lost every year through illnesses like asthma.
- The direct costs to society, including damage to crops and buildings, amounts to 23bn euros every year
In 2010, when the EU restrictions were meant to come into effect, the levels of nitrogen dioxide were exceeding the limits in 40 of these 43 areas.
Member states were able get an extra five years' grace if they put in place plans to cut levels of NO2. The UK admitted that the limits relating to 16 zones, including London, could not be met by the revised deadline of 2015.
For many of these areas, including Greater Manchester, the West Midlands, Merseyside and Glasgow, the government believes the levels can be reached by 2020.
In London though, they admit it is likely to be 2025.
For the EU, this is far too long. They've decided to launch the first case against a member state for breaching the limits on NO2.
Several other EU members, including France, Sweden, Denmark and Greece have also exceeded the levels, but the EU denied that the UK was being picked on.
Europe's nitrogen dioxide emissions in 2008 as seen from an ozone measuring instrument on a satellite
"Our priority is to protect public health and the environment," said European Commission spokesman Joe Hennon.
"We think that's what the people of the UK would want as well."
What might have tipped the EU's hand was a ruling by the UK Supreme Court last year.
In a case brought by environmental campaigners ClientEarth, the judges agreed that the government was in breach of an obligation to reduce air pollution.
In the judgement, Justice Lord Carnworth wrote that "the way is now open to immediate enforcement at national or European level."
The campaign group believes that, in addition to the Supreme Court verdict, the scale and the duration of the UK's breaches made the EU action inevitable.
"The UK has some of the worst NO2 levels in Europe, they're a national disgrace," said Alan Andrews, a lawyer with ClientEarth.
"London has a particular problem, in some streets it is three or four times above the legal limits."
The legal process could ultimately end in the European Court of Justice where the UK would face huge fines if found in breach of the directive.
Continue reading the main story The main pollutants
- Particulate matter - fine dust emitted by road vehicles, shipping and power generation. Experts are particularly concerned about particles smaller than 2.5 micrometres
- Sulphur dioxide - emitted by power generation, industry and shipping. Damages health and acidifies land and water
- Nitrogen oxides - released by road vehicles, shipping and power generation. Harms health and contributes to acid rain
- Ammonia - emitted by livestock and through the use of fertilisers. Damages health and causes acidification
- Volatile organic compounds - emitted from solvents, vehicles and power generation. They are a key component of ground-level ozone
If the government is to cut levels it will need to take drastic actions, say campaigners. Around half of new car sales are diesel powered, they say. There will need to be strict low emissions zones in cities.
"Germany implemented low emissions zones very early," said Alan Andrews.
"They have 60, we just have the one in London and ours doesn't include cars - it's a low standard."
Another option is cutting speed limits.
"The evidence from Germany suggests they can reduce NO2 by 10-15% on heavily polluted roads, but the scale here in the UK is so big they need to be looking at everything possible to tackle the problem," said Mr Andrews.
The UK has two months to respond to the European Commission.
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) said that Britain wasn't alone in breaching the NO2 limits, pointing out that in 2012, 21 member states reported their emissions did not comply with the annual mean target.
"Air quality has improved significantly in recent decades. Just like for other member states, meeting the NO2 limit values alongside busy roads has been a challenge," said a spokesman.
"That is why we are investing heavily in transport measures to improve air quality around busy roads and we are working with the commission to ensure this happens as soon as possible."
A spokeswoman for London Mayor Boris Johnson said: "Since the mayor was elected, the number of people living in areas exceeding nitrogen dioxide limits has halved but he fully recognises the need to take further action.
"This includes the introduction of the world's first ultra-low emission zone in central London from 2020, tougher requirements for taxis from 2018 and a £20m fund to tackle local problem areas."
I’m pretty sure the dinosaurs died out when they stopped gathering food and started having meetings to discuss gathering food
A bookshop is one of the only pieces of evidence we have that people are still thinking
Thank you for the post Bob, HERE is also a good link were shows it global.
The largest producer of exhaust emissions in London is the government owned bus company. They have recognised this and new buses entering service are diesel electric hybrids and hydrogen powered. Diesel electric are reducing pollution and hydrogen of course only put water vapour out the exhaust pipe.
With a bus fleet of about 9000 the change and resulting reduction in emissions is not going to happen over night if for cost reasons alone. They replace about 600 buses in the fleet a year. The newer buses going to the routes where pollution is highest.
Based on the governments own figures produced by DEFRA the average bus in London emits 822g of CO2 and carries 9 passengers. They are of course full at peak times however like all bus services they operate outside these hours as well. Based on the average passenger number the CO2 figure is 91g. An average car in London emits 140g of CO2. With an average occupant count of 1.6 people this gives a CO2 figure of 87g. As you can see the bus fleet has some way to go to matching the CO2 out put of the car fleet. This is in part down to the much quick refresh of the car fleet which has new technology than the bus fleet which requires hydrogen power to dominate to allow London to reach pollution targets.
Europe has until very recently ignored NOX and particle emissions instead concentrating on CO2. This has lead to the increase in the diesel portion of the car fleet.
However it is these same regulations why we have 2.2 litre Defenders and not 4 litre Defenders.
You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.
Yup ford transit/ranger/bt50 has the td5 3.2 puma, BMW x5- 3.0 twin turbo straight 6cyl with as much power as the RR 4.2, merc 3.0 tdv6.
Just for commonality of parts it would have made more sense to put the td5 3.2 puma in defenders as in Australia alone there where over 25,000 td5 puma engined utes sold last year to at best 1000 of the 2.2 equipped vehicles . Yes the amarok has a 2.0 that puts out over 60% more power than a puma 2.2 but what engines do it's cousins run? Toureg, q7, cayenne
Funny thing is looking at the satellite picture there seems to be a much larger area and greater concentration of red over Germany / France border and Northern Italy. Why no legal action there?
Maybe it's just a combination of the Dutch hothouses, for their flowers, and the incineration of their gardens weeds.
Nothing to do with car plants, steel mills, power plants or coal mines whatsoever'.
Intensive animal farming can be one of the reasons. Few weeks ago a dairy shed in Germany blow uo due to the concentration of gases inside
Environmental Impact of Livestock Farming in Europe : Summary
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks