Nissan Motorsport Jack Daniels Racing,Sooks Or Fair Enough?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vnx205

It appears that all the Ford fans here assume that moving a tyre that is no longer attached to the car constitutes working on the car. :D

I wonder if the marshalls will interpret the rule the same way. :D

---

Yep, I don't think anything will come of it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vnx205

It appears that all the Ford fans here assume that moving a tyre that is no longer attached to the car constitutes working on the car. :D

I wonder if the marshalls will interpret the rule the same way. :D

---

It's the race controller to tell the tyre guy to move the tyre & not let the cae to go until the tyre is moved

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 1950landy

It's the race controller to tell the tyre guy to move the tyre & not let the cae to go until the tyre is moved

---

Thats the definition from FPR. The only relevant definition is in the specific wording of the rule.

Nissan motorsport seem to be running a lot better than Kelly was making out.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Debacle

When they were running Holdens they weren't getting much better results. Maybe they have to have a look at their own organisation.

---

Never a truer word was spoken.
Pickles.

I think your forgetting the second part of the rule is for the Car Controller to ensure the car and surrounds are safe for the car to be released.... I don't think much will come of it, you could argue that the CC should have instructed one of the Tyre Changers to move it... but yes needs clarifying for future reference.......... and for the record am an FPR fan not a RBR fan........until someone brings Chrysler back at least

I don't really care to be honest,I lost interest once the cars stopped being touring cars,bring back the '80's. Pat

Pity Todd Kelly can't get his points tally higher than the number of times he is mentioned in Stewards reports.

The Yellow ones go OK.Surely its just the paintjob thats the difference.Funny thing the slow black ones also share the same driver surname:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
They would be better of playing with thier ski boats:p:p:p:p:p:p
Andrew

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Toxic_Avenger

IMO, breaking the Holden and Ford monopoly is the best thing to happen to the sport in years.
I haven't been keeping up to speed with the racing as of late, but it's refreshing to see other makes on the track, as opposed to the Red and blue knuckle-draggers of years gone by.
I agree there should be boundaries for engines in these vehicles, but detuning a car to meet the characteristics of the lowest common denominator is not good sport in my eyes. Anyone who remembers the relatively unregulated Group B rally series of the 80's will understand how awesome this could turn out to be.

---

Yes, but that's what led to them being banned. You don't want the driver & co -driver sitting on top of fuel tanks as per Lancia Delta. Nissan would have gone into this with their eyes open. Bit late to start yelling about having to use a truck motor. Maybe they should go and talk to Dodge. The Viper goes very well with a truck derived motor.