It would be no more obvious if they had "****** within" stickered across the top half of the windscreen.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sprint
Printable View
It would be no more obvious if they had "****** within" stickered across the top half of the windscreen.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sprint
I suspect they don't conform to the ADR's which call upon the Australian Standard which is applicable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sprint
Nope....Quote:
Originally Posted by Cracka
They're hardly the average B&S wannabe's ute.... Theyre 4wd's, not lowered, and not from suburbia... its the wannabe's getting around in lowered commodores with the front end of a kenworth that are the *******...Quote:
Originally Posted by V8Ian
I'm sure owner of the vehicle has more of a problem with wildlife than the risk of some suburbanite glued to thier phone stepping out in front of him....Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick_Marsh
Tuff Bullbars, the manufacturer would disagree with you.....Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick_Marsh
Regards,
Tote
Well, looking at the vehicle in the background, the bullbar appears to ft the image depicted in AS4876.1-2002 figure 2.4 (b) which is labeled "Not acceptable".Quote:
Originally Posted by Tote
if you read the press releases from tuff, they have strawman arguments that 5 posters are not prohibited by adrs /AS, which is quite true. However their bullbars are clearly non compliant, not because they are 5 posters, but rather because they angle forwards and have 'cow catchers' on the bottom.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tote
Thanks for the info down a few posts about roof lights. I admit its all so confusing with ADRs and state regs. that its hard to know what's OK.
Sent from my GT-P5210 using AULRO mobile app
I would say he's got his hands in his pockets to hide the hairy palms!Quote:
Originally Posted by Cracka
Speaking from personal experience?Quote:
Originally Posted by Saitch
As do I and I'm sure many others on this forum.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sprint