Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 36

Thread: How Much Do You Know About Climate Change?...A Quiz.

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Adelaide Hills
    Posts
    13,383
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by carjunkieanon View Post
    Then, when they die, they release the carbon anyway, unless i turn them into furniture or books.
    i think they return carbon to the ground, not into the air.
    Current Cars:
    2013 E3 Maloo, 350kw
    2008 RRS, TDV8
    1995 VS Clubsport

    Previous Cars:
    2008 ML63, V8
    2002 VY SS Ute, 300kw
    2002 Disco 2, LS1 conversion

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Crafers West South Australia
    Posts
    11,732
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Your theoretical 9 acres of trees would soak up your carbon emissions continuously, no need to plant more every year. I'd imagine that you would harvest mature timber and bury the waste instead of burning it to maximise your carbon into the soil. Dunno what burning does to the carbon balance. The method of working out how much carbon stays put in your soil is complex.

    Where does charcoal, or black carbon, in soils go?

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Bendigo
    Posts
    1,643
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I got 100%, but only because I answered q1 wrong.

    I've studied ice core samples, and although the climate has stabilised to what it was in the past, just like a ripple getting smaller in a pond, we still see the qarming and cooling cycles of the past. currently we are overdue for a warning cycle.
    But. ...what we find according to the ice core data is that this warming cycle is happening a lot quicker than any time in observable history.

    Sent from my SM-G900I using AULRO mobile app

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Sydney Hills Region
    Posts
    941
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bee utey View Post
    Your theoretical 9 acres of trees would soak up your carbon emissions continuously, no need to plant more every year. I'd imagine that you would harvest mature timber and bury the waste instead of burning it to maximise your carbon into the soil. Dunno what burning does to the carbon balance. The method of working out how much carbon stays put in your soil is complex.

    Where does charcoal, or black carbon, in soils go?
    Slaps forehead, I should've seen that I wouldn't need to plant annually (better leave the math's homework to my wife). Though, I gather mature trees take up less carbon than new growth, so I'd probably need to plant a few 9 acre plots throughout my life.

  5. #25
    cafe latte Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by carjunkieanon View Post
    Hi Cafe Latte, you might be able to answer this.

    Heard someone on ABC radio today banging on about trees being part of the solution to take up carbon in the air. But?

    An acre of trees takes up 2(ish) tonnes of carbon per year (roughly).
    'I' use 17 tonnes of carbon per year (roughly - according to Wikipedia).

    So I'd need to plant 9 acres of trees per year just to cover my usage. Those trees need water etc. Then, when they die, they release the carbon anyway, unless i turn them into furniture or books.

    How much carbon is stored in asphalt? Couldn't we just make more roads? Or make asphalt and dump it to the bottom of the ocean?

    R
    No you only have to plant them once the trees will convert CO2 all the life of the tree. Yes when the tree dies carbon will be released via burning or decomposition, but no where near what was converted during the life of the tree.
    Chris

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    SW WA
    Posts
    345
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If the pollies were really worried about this they would limit population growth, it is the elephant in the room.

  7. #27
    Homestar's Avatar
    Homestar is offline Super Moderator & CA manager Subscriber
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sunbury, VIC
    Posts
    20,105
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by kenl View Post
    If the pollies were really worried about this they would limit population growth, it is the elephant in the room.
    The biggest problem with that as I see it is that what happens when the existing population ages? We are already seeing the issues this is causing the welfare system. Imagine if you had net zero population growth - in a few generations the average age would be dramatically higher with a lower number of the working population trying to support them.

    I don't disagree we have too many people on the planet, but slowing the growth down would have many long reaching implications.

    I don't know what the answer is - cataclysmic weather events to wipe 100's of millions out? That's the way it will probably go eventually - Mother Nature will intervene and restore the balance.
    If you need to contact me please email homestarrunnerau@gmail.com - thanks - Gav.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Tumbi Umbi, Central Coast, NSW
    Posts
    5,768
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yes, it seems that is why China has had to relax its one child policy.

    Finding solutions to problems is easy. Finding solutions that don't create other problems is more difficult.

    1973 Series III LWB 1983 - 2006
    1998 300 Tdi Defender Trayback 2006 - often fitted with a Trayon slide-on camper.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ellendale Tasmania.
    Posts
    12,986
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I got 6 out of 9, one was a hit the wrong one by mistake one was couldn't remember whether it was 2025 or 2030 as the target and the other I had no clue.

    My opinion on Climate change is, yes I know it's happening and yes we are affecting it in some way, and yes we need address it, but I also think that most of the change is due to the planets natural cycle, will us reversing what we have done, help slow the planets natural cycle, assuming our affect has sped it up, I have no idea.

    I know one thing for sure, Australia isn't doing enough compared to the rest of the world.
    Cheers Baz.

    2011 Discovery 4 SE 2.7L
    1990 Perentie FFR EX Aust Army
    1967 Series IIa 109 (Farm Truck)
    2007 BMW R1200GS
    1979 BMW R80/7
    1983 BMW R100TIC Ex ACT Police
    1994 Yamaha XT225 Serow

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    3rd planet from the sun
    Posts
    1,129
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Lightbulb correlation does not imply causation

    Quote Originally Posted by Redback View Post
    ...

    I know one thing for sure, Australia isn't doing enough compared to the rest of the world.
    I would respectfully disagree. Being less than half of one percent contributor of CO2, with a similar share of global GDP, the large proportion of our media attention and federal budget is certainly honorable.

    It has already been shown that a carbon tax costs us a fortune and makes NO difference to the globe, considering the basic facts that the BIG contributors to 'green house gasses' are India, China and Russia. Let's stop punching above our weight and pretending that we can lead the world on this and every other 'good Samaritan' project, we simply don't have the revenue and contrary to some minority government opinion, the developing world doesn't march to the beat of an Australian drum.

    ** correlation does not imply causation **

    More data in the mix...

    Pirates and global warming

    Below linked chart - showing that in 1820 there were 25,000 pirates and the global average temperature was 14.2 degrees C, while in 2000 there were 17 pirates and the global average temperature was 15.9 degrees C.


    Henderson presented the argument that "global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking numbers of pirates since the 1800s".[7]

    In 2008, Henderson interpreted the growing pirate activities at the Gulf of Aden as additional support, pointing out that Somalia has "the highest number of pirates and the lowest carbon emissions of any country".[40]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying...mp%28en%29.svg

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!