Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Disco or RR

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Dubai
    Posts
    535
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Disco or RR

    Theroretically which would be best for a budget off roader, disco or rangie for the same price, both V8s with the same size tyres either 235/85s or 255/85s, nothing radical, just enough to be a good toy without breaking the bank.

    I can`t see there being much in it, disco might have a bit more space and the RR would probably have a bit lower C of G, I`d imagine over hangs would be similar on a classic and S1 disco.

    Any thoughts or ideas.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bracken Ridge, Qld
    Posts
    16,070
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I assume you've driven both ?
    My impressions are:

    Disco has heaps more headroom which I LOVE. That's in fact the thing i dislike about the luxo-barge - not enough headroom for me coz ofd a bloody sunroof. What the hell do I need oen of THOSE for ?

    The Rangie feels more 'substantial' to me. The front of the Disco seems to 'come to a point' to an extent from the drivers seat where the rangie bonnet is nice and square and solid looking. Just an impression I get from the drivers seat. I feel 'safer' ina a Rangie. No doubt its not the case.

    The 235/85's will need some surgery to the guard on a Rangie I think. Dunno about a Disco. Probably at least a lift required.

    You can definitely, here at least, pick up a disco cheaper than a Rangie in equivalent condition. Or so it seems to me.

    Disco is better for thseo sitting in the back seat - better view for them so if you have kids its worth considering.

    At 'standard' ride height a Rangie will fit into many city car parks that a Disco won't. That, mainly, is how I ended up with a Rangie.

    Really, when all is said and done, it comes down to which feels nicer to drive for YOU.

    Hope these observations help.
    It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".


    gone


    1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
    1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
    1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
    1996 Discovery 1

    current

    1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    I'd Rather Push My Land Rover in QLD Than Drive A Toyota in NSW
    Posts
    1,671
    Total Downloaded
    0
    More Rangie based comp vehicles than discos


    Most are very competitive too :wink:

  4. #4
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is offline Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,806
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB

    Re: Disco or RR

    Originally posted by cols110
    I`d imagine over hangs would be similar on a classic and S1 disco.
    A RR has a much longer rear overhang than a S1 Disco. The overhanf of a RR is pretty much the same as the SII Disco.

    There may be more accessories for D1 than for RR (in Oz).

    Ron
    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maryborough QLD
    Posts
    4,322
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Rangie.

    Pros- better balanced, softer spring rates (Discos are hardy sprung in comp.), more 'character' and cheaper to buy in equivilent spec, generally tougher than Discos IMO. Plus the 'mechano' nature of pre-86 Rangies they are rebuildable at home (remove one inner rusty panel and replace it with another [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif[/img] )

    Cons- No diesel option, less common and going that way (how many 2 door Rangies do you see on the roads, sad isn't it ). Later ones have viscous cooupling and ABS which can be costly but times have canged and they are more economic alternatives and repairs.

    Discos

    Pros- Plenty to choose from, diesel option, good comfort factor compared to earlier Rangies. Parts are plentiful as well and good value for money like Rangies are, 7 seats for bigger families although the fold-up seats are bloody awful for big blokes like me ops:

    Cons- Stiff suspension especially with those bloody sway bars on, 'generic' feel, not as well balanced as a Rangie (roof is more than double the weight especially with the 'alpine' windows or whatever there bloody called), plenty of cheap and nasty plastic.

    I've owned both. The Discos are a great vehicle, but Rangies have a better 'fell' about them off-road and on and as mentioned, better balanced off-road, where Thomas spends most of it's time

    It's a presonal prefernce and which one really suits you needs. Plenty of blokes have gone from Rangie to Disco and been more than happy with them, but other have owned them and made the same comments I had.

    Good luck with it.

    Trav

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Dubai
    Posts
    535
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks all, interesting reading, the main reason I&#96;m asking is at the moment we are living in the UK, but are on the move to Dubai next Jan, and will be spending a lot more time back in Australia than we have been able to over the last few years. So far we have just been using hire cars when ever we come home, but with the price you can pick up a V8 disco or RR, we are thinking of buying one for when ever we come home. Both the RR and Disco fit the bill perfectly, cheap, can knock over a heap of miles in comfort as well as a good offroader. The cost of fuel is&#96;nt really an issue, as we&#96;ll only be using it for a month or two a year, thats why I&#96;m not interested in spending more money on a diesel.

    As for the vehicles, no I&#96;ve never driven either, after 5 years of driving a 110, I&#96;ve never gotten around to driving a disco or RR. I actually prefer the look of the RR over the S1 disco, and it looks like a better offroad vehicle, but the disco does look a bit larger and more practical, and more readily available, with heaps of em on the market. So in all honesty I&#96;m not really fussed on which one ot get.

    All I really want to do is give it a lift, big enough to accept larger tyres and a few other minor mods. I&#96;m not interested in tying up a heap of money in lockers etc, for a toy that&#96;ll only get used every now and then.

    Thanks again for the info.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    On the beach at Hervey Bay
    Posts
    1,562
    Total Downloaded
    0

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bracken Ridge, Qld
    Posts
    16,070
    Total Downloaded
    0
    For what its worth I reckon a lifted Rangie looks better than a lifted Disco - lift a Disco and it LOOKS really top heavy. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif[/img]
    It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".


    gone


    1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
    1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
    1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
    1996 Discovery 1

    current

    1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400


  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,971
    Total Downloaded
    4.28 MB
    Rangies actually have more room in the back than a s1 disco even though the disco has a high roof .

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maryborough QLD
    Posts
    4,322
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Remember as good as Discos are, they're still a poor mans Rangie [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif[/img]

    Trav

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!