I'd say get a diesel. But here are some figures :
Best fuel economy I've had from a Land Rover V8 : 1988 Range Rover 3.5 Manual - Melbourne to Perth, doing 120kph along the Nullabour. 14 litres per 100km on the highway.
Diesel Vs Petrol - Melbourne - Simpson Desert (East-West) - Kings Canyon, Uluru - Melbourne. 200Tdi Defender Ute fully loaded (weight wise) 13 litres per 100km no difference between highway and desert. Vs SIII 2.25 Petrol on LPG about 30 litres per 100km. However the actual fuel costs for the two cars were within 10% of eachother.
300Tdi Defender Melb - Sydney - Melb @ speed limit. 10.3 litres per 100km
TD5 D2a auto Melb - Exmouth - Melb 9 litres per 100km.
Variations (Best to Worst)
Tdi 10 - 13 litres /100km
TD5 9 - 14 ltres / 100km
v8 14 - 30 litres / 100km
I have seen a 300Tdi D1 get 7.6 litres /100km driving Melb - Darwin, but he'd sit on 92kph, and without a roofrack.
Other considerations are excessive fuel costs and detours required to obtain fuel if you are in remote areas, such as the Gibb River road.
So in summary, you will use at least 40% less fuel going diesel, improve your range and fuel availability. However, it is possible to achieve similar financial economy, albiet using a lot more fuel, by staying with LPG and Petrol. The most unreliable thing about my Range Rover was the LPG system, and it did cause issues on the SIII in the aforementioned trip, resulting in lost time.
My current set up, 110 with Long Range tank and sill tanks gives me a range of around 2,400km, which means I can drive back roads, or drive all night without worrying about refuelling. Plus I can be choosy about where I buy fuel from.


Reply With Quote

--it!

Bookmarks