Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Family photos

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    werribee
    Posts
    285
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Family photos

    How many do you have, I am slowly looking at cataloguing ours but we have thousands. At the moment it seems we have at least 1,000 from 1930 to 1965. My own collection is about 10,000, 1965 on film. Probably another 5,000, since 1965 from my father. It is a problem as to what to do? As for digital I have about 20,000.
    We use to develop and print our own as well as enlarge in the old days.

  2. #2
    Tombie Guest
    All up about 500... were pretty sad at capturing that sort of stuff.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    NW Tassie
    Posts
    1,884
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My wife spent at least 12 months, probably longer scanning pictures, slides cd's etc. and putting them on varies assortments of digital systems such as removable hard drives, hard drives, laptops, thumb drives, dvd's etc. and then sharing amounst family and friend.
    cheers
    blaze

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Sydney Hills Region
    Posts
    941
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My wife started a business teaching people how to catalogue, tag, and use their photos. All digital I'm afraid, not with film.

    I was looking over her shoulder and saw the number 1,450 next to the name of one of our boys. 'Is that how many photos we have of him?' 'No, that's how many photos we took of him last MONTH!'

    She spends a LOT of time dealing with photos. Well over 150,000 on separate hard drives.

  5. #5
    Tombie Guest
    Bloody hell.... Family photos

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Lake Macquarie. NSW.
    Posts
    7,996
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I had a small business that included a photographic minilab between 1986 and 1999. Naturally we went crazy with family photo's, I have never counted them but there are boxes and boxes full of photo's in our garage.
    Now that I have semi-retired, I will have to sort and catalogue them, will be a HUGE job.

  7. #7
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,523
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've been working on my slides, and negatives, and my father's and mother's negatives for years - and I think there are more to do than I have done. And then their are my late wife's, her sister's and her father's, grandfather's great-uncle's etc. (A few go back to the nineteenth century, and a quite a few from the 1920s when my mother got her first camera.)

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  8. #8
    Tombie Guest

    Family photos

    I will ask, because I believe it will be a great discussion...

    Why so many photos? And why all kept archived or in boxes etc..
    How often do you visit the boxes?

    To give an example - my wedding album has been opened once.....
    The kids baby photos have been boxed up for 15+ years...

    I was taught whilst studying Photography to cull with prejudice Family photos quality photos and all that.
    Is it a legacy behaviour that we collect images to never look at them again?

    I understand capturing the highlights - people, faces, places...

    But 50 pics of The lad kicking a football, taking a step etc isn't something I understand... a couple of great shots showing the same would suffice. Would it not?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    werribee
    Posts
    285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    I will ask, because I believe it will be a great discussion...

    Why so many photos? And why all kept archived or in boxes etc..
    How often do you visit the boxes?

    To give an example - my wedding album has been opened once.....
    The kids baby photos have been boxed up for 15+ years...

    I was taught whilst studying Photography to cull with prejudice Family photos quality photos and all that.
    Is it a legacy behaviour that we collect images to never look at them again?

    I understand capturing the highlights - people, faces, places...

    But 50 pics of The lad kicking a football, taking a step etc isn't something I understand... a couple of great shots showing the same would suffice. Would it not?
    I agree most of our historical photos are that. As you said. In the old days we had to buy film then develop the negatives and then print them. It was a costly affair for some. So in the past most people limited the photography, due to cost. But now it essentially costs nothing apart from the camera and storage devices. Asfor revisiting, for me as I am getting older I want some connection to thepast. Not so much the modern stuff.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!