Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Ride On HP

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    S.E.Qld
    Posts
    1,401
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Ride On HP

    For 18 years I was regularly using a 11hp YardMan ride on which I bought second hand in 93. I still use it today in an area where there are lots of sticks and stones. Six years ago I bought a 19hp John Deere...nuff said..which now I'm forced to replace. I'm currently tossing up between a Toro, 24hp twin cyl. and a Walker 14hp. Do ride on's really need such big engines,and if so why ? All are 42", except the YardMan which is 38"
    .W.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    The new Gold Coast, after ocean rises,Queensland
    Posts
    13,204
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've got one of the last Yardman 42's with a Kholer 13.5kw engine. ....equates to close to 30hp.

    I think the hydrostatic drive uses up some power , but the blades are a pretty heavy item each as well to spin around.

    It can do some pretty heavy work though.

    It will easily wheelstand if you rock from reverse to forward.

  3. #3
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    More horsepower should mean it will cut just as well in thicker/longer grass, while going faster. Also, increasing power may reflect the increasing weight of the population. So if you are light, cut your lawn while it is short, and are already cutting as fast as you care to go, there should be no need to look for more power.

    Having said this, I suspect that a lot of the increase may simply reflect that $/hp has been dropping, and if we increase the key number for buyers rather than drop the price, the profit margin is preserved, or rather for the same % margin, the numbers are bigger. A lot of buyers will automatically assume that bigger is better when looking at power numbers!
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Williams West Aust
    Posts
    20,998
    Total Downloaded
    0
    We have Toros at work in a range of sizes.
    The new one is a beast.4 wheel drive and steer,
    They do a good job,and easy to maintain.
    Andrew
    DISCOVERY IS TO BE DISOWNED
    Midlife Crisis.Im going to get stuck into mine early and ENJOY it.
    Snow White MY14 TDV6 D4
    Alotta Fagina MY14 CAT 12M Motor Grader
    2003 Stacer 525 Sea Master Sport
    I made the 1 millionth AULRO post

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ballarat,Vic,Aus
    Posts
    3,855
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've had a gutfull of ride-on mowers ... SO I bought a ****ty old tractor and 5 foot slasher (if I could find a 6 foot slasher/flail/finishing mower that would be even better). Best decision I ever made. You can run over the majority of our yard in a few hours.... They don't break ... you can buy a milion and one attachments for them.

    But the biggest bonus I've found is for hayfever sufferers. Rather than sitting in the cloud of dust, grass and pollen, you sit 8/10 foot forward of the slasher that throws behind you.

    seeya,
    Shane L.
    Proper cars--
    '92 Range Rover 3.8V8 ... 5spd manual
    '85 Series II CX2500 GTi Turbo I :burnrubber:
    '63 ID19 x 2 :wheelchair:
    '72 DS21 ie 5spd pallas
    Modern Junk:
    '07 Poogoe 407 HDi 6spd manual :zzz:
    '11 Poogoe RCZ HDI 6spd manual

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Irymple, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    2,902
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by B.S.F. View Post
    For 18 years I was regularly using a 11hp YardMan ride on which I bought second hand in 93. I still use it today in an area where there are lots of sticks and stones. Six years ago I bought a 19hp John Deere...nuff said..which now I'm forced to replace. I'm currently tossing up between a Toro, 24hp twin cyl. and a Walker 14hp. Do ride on's really need such big engines,and if so why ? All are 42", except the YardMan which is 38"
    .W.
    I think you will find that one of the main reasons for the need for more horsepower is that a lot of the mowers have multiple blades/cutting heads, and have the ability to mulch, which requires the blades to spin at far more rpm.

    Cheers, Mick.
    1974 S3 88 Holden 186.
    1971 S2A 88
    1971 S2A 109 6 cyl. tray back.
    1964 S2A 88 "Starfire Four" engine!
    1972 S3 88 x 2
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-014
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-556
    1988 Perentie 110 FFR ARN 48-728 steering now KLR PAS!
    REMLR 88
    1969 BSA Bantam B175

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,131
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by mick88 View Post
    I think you will find that one of the main reasons for the need for more horsepower is that a lot of the mowers have multiple blades/cutting heads, and have the ability to mulch, which requires the blades to spin at far more rpm.

    Cheers, Mick.
    Good point. My John Deere is 25hp with 54" triple cutting deck. I don't normally have to slow down for much with this setup.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!