Oops. Better call the cops! Arr, they are already there! Oh dear
 AT REST
					
					
						AT REST Wizard
					
					
						Supporter
					
					
						Wizard
					
					
						SupporterOops. Better call the cops! Arr, they are already there! Oh dear
Cheers
Travelrover
Adventure before Dementia
2012 Puma 90 - Black
1999 Td5 110 Ute - White
1996 Tdi 300 Wagon - White
 AT REST
					
					
						AT RESTAnd legally the car behind is always at fault for failing to stop in time.
Hi,
Similar happened to my dad, the police insurance wrote off his car at a good value. He was so happy, as he was facing a big expense to rebuild the motor.
Cheers
If the driver of the red car at the front had continued through the amber light then none of this would have happened but the driver probably saw the police van in his mirror and thought "****! I'd better stop! I don't want to get done for going through a stale amber!"
Or something
2012 Discovery 4 SDV6 HSE
2003 Discovery 2 TD5
2003 Defender Xtreme
1997 Discovery V8i
Would certainly be interesting to know the result of this. Was anyone injured or charged?
Was the cop driver charged? Should have been.
Would be interesting to have been a fly on the wall when he had to explain his driving to the commander. At least in this case it was accidental, not deliberate.
I know a police commander who tells funny stories about conversations he has had with officers who have screwed up. Usually it is just accidental and just dumb behaviour. When the officer has deliberately broken the rules it can get very nasty.
That's interesting.
I saw a six car pileup once and the rear five cars were all charged for failing to stop in time. Interestingly, in that case the female front driver actually caused the pileup by slamming on her brakes to avoid a dog, but she wasn't charged.
Since then I've made a point of leaving plenty of space to the vehicle in front.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks