Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: Australia, the clever country , not !

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Heathcote Junction
    Posts
    1,155
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If you delve deeper you will find that it is not necessarily wages that are deemed to expensive.

    Sure all of the auto workers in Thailand are not paid the same as in Australia but in Europe & Japan their wages are very similar to what Australian auto workers were paid.

    I don't think it was quality either the last of the commodores were every bit as good as similarly priced European / American stuff.

    I think it is more about volume.

    Apparently the magic figure to produce automobiles in 1,000,000 which is where Landrover is aiming for.

    It is also about procedural fairness - we import twin cabs from Thailand with little or no duty yet if we exported a commodore to them it was taxed at 100%.

    This is what our week willed governments need to address.

    Here we are as a country with the highest number per capita of 4x4's in the world yet we never made one.

    As the manufacturing bases close down the last ones standing will raise their prices.

    The D5 is a good example $40k more than the equivalent D4.

    We have an ex Landrover Engineer working for us - $40k Aus to build a well specced RRS.
    Cheers

    Chuck

    MY 24 Grenadier Trialmaster
    MY 03 D2a
    Ex D1, D2, D2a, D3, D4, Prado, D4, D5, MY 23 Defender
    73 series 3 109 Truck Cab Tray Body, 79 Series, 76 Series

  2. #12
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,517
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Volume has a lot to do with it, but it is not the whole story. The costs of doing anything in Australia compared to most other places is also a major factor.

    And I don't think you can blame the issue you quote with Thailand on a "week" or even weak willed Australian government.

    The Australian market is simply not large enough to give the Australian government much leverage, and if they imposed a similar tax on Thai vehicles coming in here, the people who would be aggrieved would be the Australian buyers - and they vote, and there are a lot more of them than there are motor industry workers.

    Australia is a higher per capita buyer of 4x4s, yes - but what matters is the numbers, not the per capita. However, I do agree that we really should have been designing and building our own (and it has been done, e.g Oka).

    Why has this not been successful? Two reasons; the Australian car industry has always been almost entirely foreign owned and foreign controlled, and Australians have always been reluctant to support risky investments either by buying shares or not selling them to foreigners. And make no mistake - with viability dependent on government handouts, the motor industry has always been risky. Australian culture has always been biased against owners getting rewards commensurate with risks, so Australians tend to invest in property, not productive businesses.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Ocean Reef WA
    Posts
    3,098
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Might have helped the car industry to survive if all our vast numbers of pollies and bureacraps in all our levels of over governance, had driven Australian made vehicles.
    AlanH.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    1,317
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    But if you look at all of Australian history since 1788, by and large, the only times that manufacturing has been economically practical has been when it has been heavily protected either by tariffs or import restrictions, or when imports have not been possible (for example during two world wars). The reason for this has been that Australian living standards have been among the highest in the world, ever since the gold rush in the 1850s, and this living standard has been supported by high levels of primary production - gold (from 1852), wool (from the 1820s), grain (from about 1910), meat (from about 1880 with refrigeration), and more recently coal and iron ore, with contributions from a variety of other mineral and farm products.
    This has echoes of Donald Horne's Lucky Country book. Australia has stumbled from one boom to another, wirh the governments and people usually wasting the opportunities.
    Last edited by p38arover; 3rd June 2018 at 01:02 PM.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I worked in Australian motor manufacturing. It burns me up to see the near total demise of an industry that employed many thousands. GM-H in its heyday employed 26,000 Australians. Add in the other local manufacturers and assemblers and their outside suppliers and there was a vibrant industry providing a decent wage to mainly breadwinners.

    I get a bit angry looking at brands like Mazda who have been selling here for almost 60 years, all imports on wheels. Mazda are selling 200,000 plus vehicles annually in Australia and employ less than 300 workers. Ladbrokes , the betting shop, employ more than that in Queensland alone.

    How many Australians are on unemployment benefits? How many haven't got full time work? How many Disability Pensioners could do part time light clean work in a modern factory? We should be exporting our unemployment by insisting that importers CKD assemble say 85% of their sales volume. No tariffs, no new taxes, just build them here and employ Australians and thus leave some of their profits here. This would be a boon to local industry as many small parts are not included in CKD packs and would be purchased here. The welfare bill would be drastically reduced. Can you imagine the benefit to a country city that a car plant & suppliers employing a few hundred bread winners would bring.
    URSUSMAJOR

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Victoria
    Posts
    14,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Eevo View Post
    i dont agree.

    consumers vote with their feet. if the consumes are not buying australian it's cause its low quality or overpriced. or both.
    Consumers vote with their tightarse feet.

    We make excellent quality stuff here. We grow some of the finest produce here too.
    The trouble is, the supermarkets only stock sub par produce at inflated prices. I don't buy Californian oranges anymore because they're dry and tasteless. It's so hard to find a nice orange nowdays.
    So, where are all our sweet juicy oranges going?
    'It's like a licence to print money' — Citrus industry urges Government to help preserve China trade - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

    And don't get me started on pinapples.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    The new Gold Coast, after ocean rises,Queensland
    Posts
    13,204
    Total Downloaded
    0
    So, our high quality fruit , in a nutshell , is being marketed to asian countries , where the middle class wealthier people can afford to pay a premium price.
    Our wonderful supermarkets , bleating and lying about fresh produce , then purchase cheap lower grade produce from the very same countries that we are selling our premium produce to , and put it on the shelves for us.
    Somehow our wonderful government calls this fair trade.
    Do our politicians consume this lower grade 'fair trade' produce or is it just for the plebians?

  8. #18
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,517
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bigbjorn View Post
    I worked in Australian motor manufacturing. It burns me up to see the near total demise of an industry that employed many thousands. GM-H in its heyday employed 26,000 Australians. Add in the other local manufacturers and assemblers and their outside suppliers and there was a vibrant industry providing a decent wage to mainly breadwinners.

    I get a bit angry looking at brands like Mazda who have been selling here for almost 60 years, all imports on wheels. Mazda are selling 200,000 plus vehicles annually in Australia and employ less than 300 workers. Ladbrokes , the betting shop, employ more than that in Queensland alone.

    How many Australians are on unemployment benefits? How many haven't got full time work? How many Disability Pensioners could do part time light clean work in a modern factory? We should be exporting our unemployment by insisting that importers CKD assemble say 85% of their sales volume. No tariffs, no new taxes, just build them here and employ Australians and thus leave some of their profits here. This would be a boon to local industry as many small parts are not included in CKD packs and would be purchased here. The welfare bill would be drastically reduced. Can you imagine the benefit to a country city that a car plant & suppliers employing a few hundred bread winners would bring.
    Australia insisted on CKD assembly at a minimum for most cars from about 1914 to the early eighties - as the tariffs that enforced this were wound down. The result was that by then locally assembled cars were so expensive and backward in design compared to world prices that, for example, Mazda, was able to fully import cars, and sell competitively against local cars even paying the tariff. And, for waht it is worth, I do recall even hearing of Mazda until the late seventies; they may have been here, but in a very small way.

    it is also worth pointing out that manufacturing has never employed a huge proportion of the Australian workforce - just that the major manufacturers such as motor vehicle manufacturers have large numbers of employees at a single location, giving the owners and unions a potent political weapon.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    Australia insisted on CKD assembly at a minimum for most cars from about 1914 to the early eighties - as the tariffs that enforced this were wound down. The result was that by then locally assembled cars were so expensive and backward in design compared to world prices that, for example, Mazda, was able to fully import cars, and sell competitively against local cars even paying the tariff. And, for waht it is worth, I do recall even hearing of Mazda until the late seventies; they may have been here, but in a very small way.

    it is also worth pointing out that manufacturing has never employed a huge proportion of the Australian workforce - just that the major manufacturers such as motor vehicle manufacturers have large numbers of employees at a single location, giving the owners and unions a potent political weapon.
    JD, Mazdas were first sold here about 1961-62 and were well established with small and medium sedans by 1967. I first saw one at a Brisbane motor show about '62 on the Westco Motors stand. Our first thoughts were "Mazda? Light bulbs?"
    URSUSMAJOR

  10. #20
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,517
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Your probably right about the date - just nobody I knew owned one until later. I remember the first imported Jap cars - the first one anyone I knew owned was a Mitsubishi Colt in 1963. The vinyl upholstery disintegrated after about three months in the Queensland sun, and we reckoned it was not much of a competitor. I think that rather than price, what it sold on was equipment - it came with a radio and a heater, which were definitely not standard on most of the locally assembled cars - although this helped sell my father on a Simca in 1959.

    I remember Mazda as a latecomer from Japan, with Nissan (Datsun at first) and Toyota early. Mitsubishi replaced Simca as Chrysler's partner in about 1961, and started local assembly soon after.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!