I fail to see how vegetarianism can cause such anger to the point of war mongering!?😳
Printable View
I fail to see how vegetarianism can cause such anger to the point of war mongering!?😳
With most grazing be free range/rangeland grazing and most farms being irrigated I am unsure how you can make your statement.
Add into that that a vast amount of grazing cattle happens on land that is not suitable for cropping and once again your statements fail any common sense evaluation.
Thinking that you will find that most of the clearing of the worlds rainforest is happening for crops like soy or palm kernel and not grazing.
Thinking you have already found your little drug induced utopia void of any facts....
Advocating people compulsory adopt any lifestyle (religion, political view point, culture) is no different to war mongering. People who don't agree with your 'perfectly sensible solutions' will not adopt them.
They will disagree at first, they will resist next and finally they will fight against it. You see it all other world. Has been that way in the past. Will be that way in the future.
People don't act in the best interests of the world they act in self interest. Always have, always will.
Remove cattle and sheep from a property, leave it for a decade and be amazed at how fast even bare earth revegetates.
🐞🦋🐌🦄🐥🐂🐖🐓🍀🌈🥦🍅🍍🥑🌭🍕🍣
🙈🙉🙊 🍺
That is like saying “stop all the people from using water out of our dams and see how much water they retain”
100% factual yet totally useless point....
I have also seen property that has had no livestock on it for over 30 years that is full of erosion due to any decent ground cover by grass to stop erosion and is in very poor condition compared to the property through the fence.
That is of course before the destruction that will occur when they burn and nearly the same amount of emissions will escape directly into the atmosphere without producing anything.
Knock yourself out in 50 years, I'll put it in my calandar now. 😆
The truth is we don't need a lot of what we have to live a healthy life - where do you start and stop. Don't need large houses, large blocks of land, takeaway food, alcohol, smokes, Land Rovers, more than 1 car per family, recreation grounds, parks, pets, couches, knives and forks, toilet paper...
Where do you stop? All the things I've listed above have a negative impact on the world - maybe we should just go back to living in a cave eating and you can eat weeds while I eat what eats the weeds...
Homstar Food and shelter are needs of course not wants and yes you are dead right we are all consuming things that are not good for the planet.
As for the other meat positive comments... I get that true long paddock and free range beast production is fairly neutral (save for erosion and farts) but setting that aside my comments were about clearing and there has been and continues to be far too much especially in South America. Also we are a fresh water challenged country and the unpalatable truth is that it takes a lot of water to get a cow to the plate. And a lot of vegetables and grains that could be feeding people. Meat production especially in times of low rain and when fattening in feedlots is very water and grain intensive and, again, it will eventually be sin binned as not sustainable. I grew up in a family where we grew and slaughtered our own beef and loved a steak at much as anyone but I can see it's not sustainable especially at the rate of uptake and given the world's huge rate of growth. But no, let's just ignore the facts and...I know...start selling Big Macs at breakfast time cause christ knows we just cant wait until 11.30am to get one...
Cheers
It's easy. Governments will eventually stop clearing for cattle.production and reduce water allowances save for vegetable and grain production for human consumption. Eventually meat supplies will drop and the cost of a steak will became prohibitive and people will turn to veg. So meat won't be banned as such but it might as well be.
Cheers