Speaking as a "soccer dad" with three rows of kids, we bought a second hand D4 instead of a new D5 because:
- it's boxy shape is practical, efficient and spacious;
- the square corners and large glass all round make it easy to manoeuvre, even though it's quite a big car. Even reversing without the camera is possible, in contrast our CR-V is a pig, without a camera you're just guessing where it's going;
- kids in the third row have theatre seating, leg room, and large waist height windows and in our case their own sunroof and air vents, so it's a light and spacious place to be on long trips, they can see out, including forward and the kids don't feel like they've been shoved in the boot. There's also sufficient leg room for adults;
- the second row has width and legroom for adults and three identically sized, separately foldable seats;
- the split tailgate;
- the very tight turning circle - tighter than our much smaller CR-V.
In contrast the D5:
- has prioritised looks and possibly aerodynamics over practicality;
- has blind spots everywhere: you're going to need a camera to reverse - even with the front corners you're guessing where things are;
- the third row is dark, windowless and claustrophobic - the windows are like portholes and are smaller and higher on the inside than they appear to be from the outside. There was a video of the D5 pre-release with the designers' young kids in it and I noticed that the kids were unable to see out of the third row. This is exacerbated by the fact that they've dropped the seat height so that you're closer to the floor: this was necessary because they've also dropped the roof height to make it swoopy;
- the third row has less legroom: sure the seats are the same size but they're closer to the floor, so when I compared them I found that in the D5 my knees were folded up towards my chest which is not the case in the D4;
- the second row has less visibility and no longer folds separately - I cannot understand why they changed this;
- there's no split tailgate and the drop down thing is idiotic;
- haven't heard anything about the turning circle so can't comment.
It's easy to mock people who buy the D4 as a suburban people-mover, which is what we could be accused of, but said people are not stupid. Speaking of the D4 an owner told a Carguide reviewer why they'd bought a D4:
"Joshua," she said in italics, as if I had asked a really dumb question, "it's a seven-seater than can actually fit adults in the back, you can fit three kid seats across the middle row, the windows are massive so you can see out of the bloody thing and it has a tight turning circle."
Exactly. In our case we'd also considered a Carnival but the D4 is actually more compact and there's at least the prospect of going off-road.
Whilst I see plenty of D4s around my kids' schools, I don't see any D5s. At all. I think that LR have lost an entire demographic by dishing up something that has the same name as the previous vehicle but had none of the attributes that made it worth buying.
Edit: said suburbanites were also painfully aware that LR have lots of dodgy products - Evoque is a current case in point - and aren't willing to put money down on a D5 until all the gremlins have been sorted out. And true to LR form there have been issues with the D5 - HVAC and media display and oil dilution for starters.


Reply With Quote



Bookmarks