Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 63

Thread: WEBBER CALLS FOR INCREASED SPEED LIMITS

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Avoca Beach
    Posts
    14,152
    Total Downloaded
    0
    And all other Europeans used to be deadly afraid of the Dutch as they travel at 80Kmh and used to not have a driving test. They were known for turning caravans turtle on the autobahns on the way to Spain..

    On that note I remember being in Europe in about 1980 just after the wall went down and there were broken down Trabants everywhere. In Italy, France , Germany , Austria they littered the roadsides.

    I also remember seeing a Romanian tour bus broken down in Italy .
    The osters were just loving their first taste of freedom and it was glorious to see.

    It was personified by the movie Go Trabi Go!
    Regards Philip A

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Sydney Hills Region
    Posts
    941
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    Because the majority brake instead of accelerating and zippering in.
    No one knows how to merge!!
    It drives me spare!!



    (See what I did there? WEBBER CALLS FOR INCREASED SPEED LIMITS)

    [edit 19/3]I nearly hit a Subaru fair up the clacker this morning as I accelerated to merge they hit the anchors!
    ****!
    I'm curious as to how merging will be effected by those auto-braking systems these fandangly new cars have that hit the brakes when you get too close to the car in front. 1) Your the car trying to merge in, does the auto-braking system make it harder to get right up close to the car in front of you also merging? 2) Does the auto-braking system mean that when you do merge, your car hits the brakes as you're 'too close' to the car you've merged behind? And 3) When you merge neatly in, the car you're now in front of will hit the brakes, then the car behind that, etc.

    Has anyone experienced anything like that?

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5,164
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The merging at higher speed problem brings me to one of my pet peeves, which is why I think they should have different speeds for different lanes, say 80-100 for the merging/outer/slow lane then say 100-130 for the next lane and then say 130-160 for the 3rd lane if there is one. I think they should start this system now, even if there is no speed increase, so a lot of the clowns on the road can get it into their thick skulls that slower traffic should be in the left lane, and not in the passing lane!

  4. #44
    DiscoMick Guest
    We don't use blinkers and lights well in Oz. Too many people turn without indicating. We don't use lights to let others know we are there. People think being flashed is rude, not a safety sign. If speed limits were raised drivers would need training in how to use lights and blinkers much better, I think.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Armstrong Creek, Qld
    Posts
    8,758
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Aussie driver skills would definitely have to improve.
    I've driven a lot of kilometres in several Euro countries, some with the "Latin Temperament" drivers, a lot of the time in the 140-160+ kph range and never felt uncomfortable.
    Get on our glorious, 110 kph, multi lane Brissie to Gold Coast dodgem cars rink and you have to have eyes in your arse. I've found that, a lot of the time, the left lane moves better than the outer lanes because it's nearly empty.
    Another issue on this stretch is the heavy vehicles sitting side by side in two or three of the lanes. They'd be sorted out in nano seconds in Europe.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide Hills. South Australia
    Posts
    13,349
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by RANDLOVER View Post
    The merging at higher speed problem brings me to one of my pet peeves, which is why I think they should have different speeds for different lanes, say 80-100 for the merging/outer/slow lane then say 100-130 for the next lane and then say 130-160 for the 3rd lane if there is one. I think they should start this system now, even if there is no speed increase, so a lot of the clowns on the road can get it into their thick skulls that slower traffic should be in the left lane, and not in the passing lane!

    I don't know about other States but here you can only do 80 & above in the RH (outer to me ) lane. Still seems to be too slow for some overtaking drivers though.

    Under 80, you get over to the more appropriate lane

    Sticking in the centre lane always seems to be a good compromise.

    Drove the 2A up the M1 Freeway years ago & never got out of the far left "Truck" lane But I was running on 750x16s. Fortunately I never had to overtake a truck of any sort.

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 4bee View Post
    I don't know about other States but here you can only do 80 & above in the RH (outer to me ) lane. Still seems to be too slow for some overtaking drivers though.

    Under 80, you get over to the more appropriate lane

    Sticking in the centre lane always seems to be a good compromise.

    Drove the 2A up the M1 Freeway years ago & never got out of the far left "Truck" lane But I was running on 750x16s. Fortunately I never had to overtake a truck of any sort.


    I've found Qld drivers on the whole have no idea what 'keep left unless overtaking' means....

    The wallopers seem to enforce it south of the border, I'm guessing that doesn't happen in the north.

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide Hills. South Australia
    Posts
    13,349
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've found Qld drivers on the whole have no idea what 'keep left unless overtaking' means.

    OOPS I Read that Rick, & thought, 'ullo, Rick is having a pop at me "Old drivers" indeed.

    Then I read it again & noticed the little tail on the Q (it probably has a name) but......



    That's how world wars start you know.


    Yep, it is as though they never learn't to read. Or think.



    Re Q:


    Interesting for such a tiny tail. Yes, it is apparently called a tail.
    Old-style serif fonts, such as Garamond, contained two capital Qs: one with a short tail to be used in short words, and another with a long tail to be used in long words.[17] Some early metal type fonts included up to 3 different Qs: a short-tailed Q, a long-tailed Q, and a long-tailed Q-u ligature.[14] This print tradition was alive and well until the 19th century, when long-tailed Qs fell out of favor: even recreations of classic typefaces such as Caslon began being distributed with only short Q tails.[20][14] Not a fan of long-tailed Qs, American typographer D. B. Updike celebrated their demise in his 1922 book Printing Types, claiming that Renaissance printers made their Q tails longer and longer simply to "outdo each other".[14] Latin-language words, which are much more likely than English words to contain "Q" as their first letter, have also been cited as the reason for their existence.[14] The long-tailed Q had fallen completely out of use with the advent of early digital typography, as many early digital fonts could not choose different glyphs based on the word that the glyph was in, but it has seen something of a comeback with the advent of OpenType fonts and LaTeX, both of which can automatically typeset the long-tailed Q when it is called for and the short-tailed Q when not.[21][22]
    Owing to the allowable variation in the Q, the letter is a very distinctive fea

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 4bee View Post
    OOPS I Read that Rick, & thought, 'ullo, Rick is having a pop at me "Old drivers" indeed.

    Then I read it again & noticed the little tail on the Q (it probably has a name) but......



    That's how world wars start you know.


    It wouldn't be the first time something like that has happened here.

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Back down the hill.
    Posts
    29,779
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Pistols at dawn?
    If you don't like trucks, stop buying stuff.
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/signaturepics/sigpic20865_1.gif

Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!