View Poll Results: Do you agree with the ban on climbing Uluru?

Voters
51. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    14 27.45%
  • No

    37 72.55%
Page 11 of 25 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 241

Thread: The Banning of Climbing Uluru (Ayers Rock) - thoughts on this article?

  1. #101
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    The new Gold Coast, after ocean rises,Queensland
    Posts
    13,204
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Roverlord off road spares View Post
    or bikini clad women sun baking on top of tombstones. This happened near Lake Glenmaggie vic
    someone always throws in one like this , hahaha


    wheres the photo?

  2. #102
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide Hills. South Australia
    Posts
    13,349
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Some nationalities even call us 'Kangaroos'. I don't mind, me being unique & all.

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5,160
    Total Downloaded
    0
    People want to climb the rock because other feats are denied them, like climbing Everest. I agree with "Roy & H.G." the reason for this is, selfishness, on the part all the people climbing Everest these days (there are actually queues hundreds of feet long to get to the top) , if each of them just took one brick or paving stone with them and left it up there, we would all be able to drive to the top.

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,770
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoMick View Post
    I agree.
    Back on topic then.
    Don't climb the rock - it's rude to the owners.
    I was born here, I own it too.
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

  5. #105
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by loanrangie View Post
    I was born here, I own it too.
    No you don't - I was born here too and I have no claim over your land or house.
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Adelaide Hills
    Posts
    13,383
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 101RRS View Post
    No you don't - I was born here too and I have no claim over your land or house.

    so why do they?
    Current Cars:
    2013 E3 Maloo, 350kw
    2008 RRS, TDV8
    1995 VS Clubsport

    Previous Cars:
    2008 ML63, V8
    2002 VY SS Ute, 300kw
    2002 Disco 2, LS1 conversion

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Geraldton WA
    Posts
    8,284
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I believe that the ban on climbing the rock has more to do with politics than it has to do with "Culture" or safety.
    You only get one shot at life, Aim well

    2004 D2 "S" V8 auto, with a few Mods gone
    2007 79 Series Landcruiser V8 Ute, With a few Mods.
    4.6m Quintrex boat
    20' Jayco Expanda caravan gone

  8. #108
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,770
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Eevo View Post
    so why do they?
    Exactly , its on public land so well all own it.
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

  9. #109
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by loanrangie View Post
    Exactly , its on public land so well all own it.
    But it is not on public land - now on private land, aboriginal land.

    When did Uluru-Kata Tjuta become a national park?

    Ayers Rock (which we now call Uluru) was first declared a national park in 1950.
    In 1958, both Ayers Rock and Mount Olga (now Kata Tjuta) were excised from an Aboriginal reserve to form the Ayers Rock–Mt Olga National Park. The park’s name was changed to Uluru and Kata Tjuta (Ayers Rock–Mt Olga) National Park in 1977.
    In 1985, after more than 35 years of campaigning, Anangu were recognised as the traditional owners of the park and handed back the deeds to their homelands.


    The park was officially renamed Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park in 1993.



    Who owns Uluru and Kata Tjuta?

    Anangu own Uluru and Kata Tjuta and lease the land to the Australian Government.

    Parks Australia and Anangu work together as partners, jointly managing the national park.
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  10. #110
    Ean Austral Guest
    Its actually a national park in the Northern territory ,which is under the rule of the commonwealth ,so my simple brain tells me its crown land. - happy to be proven wrong.

    You are charged a fee to enter the national park , I have no doubt taxpayer funds are used to maintain the area , yet you are told the part in the middle that you came to see is owned by someone else and they will tell you what you can and cant do ... It isn't a dwelling or something that has been man made , its something made by nature , so for my simple brain its totally different to a house, church, etc etc

    The rock has been trodden over by tourists for decades, poles have been hammered into it and a chain hand rail has been erected , so I guess for all intents it has been vandalised , and yet a date to stop people accessing the climb is somehow going to cure the past....mmmm

    My 2c worth is there would be more benefit if tourist groups or anyone wishing to climb it has to watch a video , or even better, sit in on a talk by the local people as to why its sacred and explain their beliefs and educate people , both from within Australia and overseas, then ask that their wishes to not climb it be respected. It could also be used to pass on the story of the land to the younger generations of people

    I think this would be a far better approach and would go along way towards both educating and closing the gap between indigenous and non indigenous people. The current approach is just broadening the gap , as you only need to read this thread to see that its not seen as a popular way forward. It reeks of the us / them which I am sure is not the local people's intention at all , its a political / media football which I am sure people with agendas will use to drive their point.

    For me , I been there about 5 or 6 times and in my younger days was too lazy to be bothered to climb it , and not sure if I would climb it if I went back , but I would like to hear first hand why I shouldn't climb it instead of a sign saying its closed to climbing.

    This is my own view personal view , so OK let me have it.

    Cheers Ean

Page 11 of 25 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!