
 Originally Posted by 
4bee
					
				 
				Well I did watch & hear his interview with the media on SKY Philip so unless it was heavily edited that is what I heard.
I thought at the time that was a bit of a weird statement to make as it did sound like he may have been siding with the bloke.
			
		 
	 
 I also saw the entire press conference and he did say what everyone thought he said BUT to me he was implying that all aspects of the investigation will covered including his dominant behaviour and him maybe being pushed too far as well all other aspects.  Unfortunately his choice of examples was not articulated well and it all came out wrong.  
Similar has happened to me - a while back I was responsible for the construction and commissioning of a small detention facility on Horn Is in the Torres Strait.  When it was almost completed I had to show the Minister and other high ranking officials around and I noticed the boundary fence had the barb wire section at the top angled out instead of in - effectively to keep people out instead of in - I explained this error to the party and as Horn Island is Aboriginal Land my comment was taken to mean we had built the facility to keep aboriginals out  - all I said was that a mistake had been made and the fence as installed effectively kept people out rather than in and it would have to be corrected. 
In view of the public sentiment I think it appropriate he be taken off the case for public confidence reasons but it should not otherwise effect him.
Garry
				
			 
			
		 
			
				
			
			
				REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101 
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
			
			
		 
	
Bookmarks