The Bad News is...and always was... some of the corona test kits are of variable accuracy. If the RT - PCR test is used, then it's own inventer did not approve of it for 'Diagnostic Purposes'. This would explain the soc-called re-infection of a recovered patient... inaccurate test.
Dr Kary Mullis article is well worth a read through, some background to the test procedure and results will help in understanding the current mess. It's never as simple as we'd like! - or like the popular press and pollies say:-
Was the COVID-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus? - UncoverDC
Here's a modern up-to-date one, sadly, an Epic Fail. I doubt it will be the last.
Coronavirus 'game changer' testing kits could be unreliable, UK scientists say | World news | The Guardian
More background on the tests vs results.
David Icke | The Real Epidemic
The other night on TV, Australia's 'infected' number was given as something like 6,488, with SIXTY FOUR deaths.
I don't recall if it included the recovered... What is that in % ? And how much larger is it than the normal, common, annual Flu season ? - Don't forget that a number of those 64 are not Aussie citizens from Cruise Ships though some are... which is not surprising.
Just to hand, Tom Hanks & Wife were treated with... choroquinone (spelling?) You can get a similar result using the supplement Quercetain and zinc (Oysters, eggs, zinc gummies etc). I'ts the zinc that interferes with the virus replication, and the drug & supplement above 'pull' zinc into the cells.