
 Originally Posted by 
Arapiles
					 
				 
				Am I alone in finding these closed borders and what's basically state-based nationalism bizarre?  Since when have people identified primarily as a Queenslander or South Australian and only secondarily as Australians?
The similarities to the States' responses now and to the 1918 pandemic are striking, but the difference is that in 1918 the Commonwealth was new and yet 102 years later we're getting the same responses.  
"In November 1918, the various state authorities had entered into an agreement for dealing with the threat, but it did not long hold. In his groundbreaking social history of the Spanish influenza epidemic, Humphrey McQueen suggested that in relation to many matters, “the Commonwealth of Australia passed into recess”.
“The dislocation of interstate traffic is quite unavoidable,” commented the Tamworth Daily Observer on January 31 1919, “as naturally the clean States could not be expected to continue communications with the infected.” "
That could have come from Bob directly.
And, it's the same States - Queensland, WA, SA and Tasmania - responding in the same manner now as they did then.  How is that the case?
 
	 
 You should at least try to get the history correct.
"the virus broke through our maritime defences and caused an almighty bunfight between Victoria and NSW when it leapt over state lines.Victoria was slow to declare an outbreak, such was its overconfidence in its quarantine measures. NSW ended up declaring cases first, followed a day later by Victoria.A day after that, NSW closed its borders to Victoria – in defiance of a national agreement hammered out in late 1918 in preparation for the pandemic – leaving many people stranded on the opposite side to where they lived."
				
			
Bookmarks