as someone without tats, do they?Quote:
Originally Posted by RHS58
Printable View
as someone without tats, do they?Quote:
Originally Posted by RHS58
needles, ink, what could possibly go wrong....Quote:
Originally Posted by Eevo
as long as their clean. shouldt be that hard.Quote:
Originally Posted by incisor
As the current pandemic has demonstrated - it is hard to keep things clean enough to prevent infection; the correct word is "sterile", not "clean". Tattoo practices have improved somewhat since they had the finger pointed at them for AIDS transmission - heard the term "shared needles"? Doesn't only apply to drug injection! But the health aspects of tattos are nowhere near as closely monitored (or worried about) as vaccinations, but they probably should be.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RHS58
Mental health has been forgotten in all this. With the myriad of different tat genre out there, some youngsters are going to seriously regret their ink in future years. I know of a couple of young'uns that have tried to emulate another but with a tattooist of a very different skill level that shouldn't be allowed anything other than crayons and paper. Nothing short of stupid little (permanent) doodles many of them.Quote:
Originally Posted by incisor
Google it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eevo
I also imagine there’s also lots of tattoo regret resulting from poor spelling, punctuation, etc, not to mention the dilemma of what to do when your girlfriend leaves you after you’ve had her name tattooed onto some part of your anatomy.
Anyway, we’ve digressed from the original topic, and should get back on track.
19,600 members in total?
only 87 reply to possibly the most pertinent thread at the moment?
wonder what the most popular thread is at the moment...
The app is up and running.
Coronavirus tracing app COVIDSafe now fully functional, Deputy Chief Medical Officer confirms
Professor Kelly said 5.6 million Australians had now downloaded the COVIDSafe app
only 22% of the population
The AULRO poll shows 41 definites. If you take the def. nots, prob. nots and no phone numbers, they add to 41.
What does this show? What does it all mean? How can we use these statistics. Do 50% of AULRO pollers make up 22% of the 19,600 members. So many questions.