The Murray darling is beset by the competing demands of irrigators who have all been granted licences to remove water from the river by their respective state governments. The state governments have proven recently that they are incapable of working together to achieve a collaborative outcome.
Cubby is only pumping what it is allowed to, along with most other irrigators on the river. If Cubby is harvesting floodwater where would that floodwater go if not captured? However Cubby isnt the problem, the over allocation of irrigation licenses is. 
How do you wind back a scheme where state governments have issued licenses for more water that they have and where resuming those licenses would impact on industries and towns along the river. It's easy to make statements such as just shut (insert irrigator here) down, however that irrigator is operating under a legally issued licence from their respective government.
There is also the perspective of the "environmentalists" who want regular flows at any cost and will not accept that in a river system that naturally fluctuates between 0 and 12 metre river heights there will be events like fish kills.
The Murray Darling Basin Authority is probably a good start but they only have oversight of state resources and no control over flood flows that are not controlled by dams. 
Regards,
Tote
				
			 
			
		 
			
				
			
			
				Go home, your igloo is on fire....
2014 Chile Red  L494 RRS Autobiography Supercharged
MY2016 Aintree Green Defender 130 Cab Chassis
1957 Series 1 107 ute - In pieces
1974 F250 Highboy - Very rusty project 
Assorted Falcons and Jeeps.....
			
			
		 
	
Bookmarks