I've had varying experiences with two inspectors on our stone house built in 1860. The first one was a building inspector that we hired for the pre purchase inspection who gave us a frank description of the condition of the house, 100 year old termite damage and kitchen floor that was completely gone with dry rot having been built with the bearers on the ground in the 1880s. He then caveated it with "It hasnt fallen over in the last 140 years so its not going to tomorrow". He was a tradie and we were very happy with the report.
A couple of banks have valued it since and have used the same valuer with much less satisfactoy results. This guy did a valuation for the bank when we bought the place with the rotten floors etc and then came back about 10 years later when we went to refinance. We had built a new kitchen and inside bathroom and he valued it for less than we had purchased it for because "its condition had deteriorated" despite the new kitchen, bathroom and 10 years of land value appreciation. He was completely incompetent to value anything that he did not have a comparison with four doors down in the same street. The joys of owning a heritage listed home.........
So at least some of them are OK but unfortunately you don't always get to pick who does it if a bank or a prospective purchaser is involved. I would suspect that owner built houses are also tarred with the same brush as heritage ones by valuers because they don't have an immediate comparison in the same street and they actually have to use their skills to understand the condition of the house that they are valuing.
Regards,
Tote
				
			 
			
		 
			
				
			
			
				Go home, your igloo is on fire....
2014 Chile Red  L494 RRS Autobiography Supercharged
MY2016 Aintree Green Defender 130 Cab Chassis
1957 Series 1 107 ute - In pieces
1974 F250 Highboy - Very rusty project 
Assorted Falcons and Jeeps.....
			
			
		 
	
Bookmarks