
Originally Posted by
Ace
I think ford are looking at the whole picture. In terms of the extra cost of making the car, therefore the premium you pay at the dealer for getting the petrol engine, for example the TDi Golf my boss bought set him back nearly 40k, but he gets 5L/100km, he could have gotten the equivalent petrol for 5-8k less which is a considerable amount of fuel. When you look at the extra interest you pay on the loan, the fact that 5-8k would make up the extra $30/week cost for fuel you would need to do some serious Km's a year to get that saving back.
But in Australia we look at things differently. We are happier quite often to pay an extra $50 a week on a car loan to get the diesel to save $30 a week at the bowser, which is what ford are trying to get across. Whilst diesel is dearer than petrol a diesel engine uses less fuel which makes a diesel look like the economic choice but when you weigh up all the costs its not the choice.
Take a V8 Disco for example. You can get Disco II V8 bloody cheap, sometimes as much as 10k cheaper than a TD5, that 10k would add $50 a week to a loan repayment easily, not to mention the 8 odd percent interest on top of that. Now weigh up the fact that unleaded is 10c/L cheaper than diesel buying the V8 looks like the economic choice. But people dont think about it that way. We think yes but its costing me alot more per week to fill the V8 but they dont look at all the other costs of owning a TD5 and add them all up. Matt
Bookmarks