The less said about the " special K's ", the better.
why ? they actually played brilliant tennis. The speed and responses to returns was amazing.....and what about those last few serves from Nick? No player in the world could have returned those.
The less said about the " special K's ", the better.
why ? they actually played brilliant tennis. The speed and responses to returns was amazing.....and what about those last few serves from Nick? No player in the world could have returned those.
Because they are complete flogs and horrible role models for their sport (or any sport for that matter.)Quote:
Originally Posted by ramblingboy42
I thought they had fun & enjoyed themselves used to be what sport was about.
Jonesfam
Yes but only as things are going Kyrgios way. As soon as things change and he comes under pressure, the less than desirable traits become obvious.Quote:
Originally Posted by jonesfam
Agreed, yelling at the umpire, smashing racquets, swearing and more - completely uncalled for. Bad losers are nothing to be celebrated. Yes they won this time but when they aren’t they are an embarrassment to the whole Country.Quote:
Originally Posted by 101RRS
Medvedev did the same, lots of players do it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Homestar
The " special K's" are to tennis what UFC is to boxing.Quote:
Originally Posted by jonesfam
Well, that's two States that have claimed her, that didn't want to know her when she wasn't a champion. Her great grandmother came from Northern Victoria, something the Vics jumped on. She was raised in Qld, and learned her tennis at Ipswich.Quote:
Originally Posted by SpudHeadTed
Hi,
Always amused me how some motor mouths behind microphones 'adopt' a newly successful sports player deemed barely worth a mention a few days ago.
Cheers
Quote:
Originally Posted by V8Ian
X2.