The comment about the media wanting contrarian views is interesting - the actual issue is that the (responsible) media want to, or are required to, provide "balance" by getting a differing opinion. That's fine with social or general news issues, but they shouldn't've been applying it to a scientific issue where there was broad consensus amongst scientists. It meant that the fringe contrarians were being presented as legitimate and that the issue was 50/50 - it's not. It's as if every time they discuss the world being a globe they have to "balance" it by giving air time to people who believe that the world is flat*.
*Flat earth - I presumed these people were joking but they're not - they actually believe that the world is flat.



Reply With Quote



Bookmarks