Originally Posted by solmanic
Whilst I'm on my high horse - does anybody else find it strange that we can map the human genome, manipulate sub-atomic particles, yet we can't make a commercially viable hydrogen combustion engine fuelled by water?
When discoveries in the fields of genetics and atomic-physics are in the interest of business they can't hit the market soon enough. By the same token, if a discovery is AGAINST the interest of business, it is killed off or stifled.
A friend of mine today commented how his dad had seen a story in the 80s about a guy in Tasmania (I think) who had made a hydrogen engine. I wonder whose shelf that idea is sitting on now. Since there is obviously mega-bucks still to be made from conventional oil-derived fuelled vehicles, big oil and motown would, I presume, have the means to prevent any alternative from cutting their lunch.
So my theory is that just as computers never double in power - they always increase in speed bit by bit so the marketing machines can squeeze every cent out of people, likewise we will continue to use oil-based fuelled motive power until the powers that be deem that there is more money to be made from a change.
We shall find out about the hydrogen-powered car on a "need to know" basis and, friends, big oil and GM probably don't think we need to know yet.
In short - at what price per litre would you consider stopping driving? $2/l, $5/l?
For me it may be somewhere in-between - so the oil economy will continue as long as demand is not squashed by the price increase. Only then will we see any alternatives emerge. I don't think, as ABC's Four Corners suggested, that we will run-out of oil stone cold. It will be controlled by big oil and the other key stakeholders and we will be stretched as far as we can go then, when more money is to be made, we will suddenly find out that the H(for hydrogen)V6 Discovery5 is the "must have" 4x4 for 2015.