Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: General chat Economics " induced demand"

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,770
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by chuck View Post
    So if you use the Ring Road & Hume Hwy your going to a slum.

    Really!!!

    More space & trees out my way than St Helena.
    Only once you get past whittlesea.
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,109
    Total Downloaded
    0
    this oz bloke has a video on it (well half of it )

    The biggest myths about economics, debunked | Economics Explained - YouTube

    -P

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Knaresborough North Yorkshire UK
    Posts
    1,922
    Total Downloaded
    0
    A long time ago was friends with someone who was involved with the design and buildings of transport infrastructure. Asked about a new stretch of raid that was curved when it could have been straight which seemed odd to me. His response was that it was done to be able to park more cars in the space than one lane or a straight road could

    Made the point that a road speed was dependent on how many cars could exit the road. Hence the need to build parking space so it did not impact others further back who might then not be able to exit the road as backed up traffic was blocking it

    All this was of course subject to political ‘views’ on what to build and where. As all traffic movement car, bus and train had to be seen as one which was often beyond politicians who had short term views on projects which needed to look forward 10 to 50 years. Each time you cut back you only made the solution more expensive and difficult to achieve. Transport gas to be built as part of the bigger picture not added in later

    Was said to ignore anyone who spoke about unlimited car journeys as they had no idea. All journeys by any method of transport were finite in number as people did not travel for the sake of it. This was a political sound bite statement not fact. More movement was a sign of economic activity and reduction was proven to be followed by reduced economic activity

  4. #14
    NavyDiver's Avatar
    NavyDiver is online now Very Very Lucky! Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    10,247
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Rebuttal.

    The interesting rebuttal as a few factors which blew me away and oddly much more agreeing with the Induced Demand one he rebutts I love economics. A Social Science NOT an exact Science


  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,109
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have seen that one yes but compared to EE he was more of an apologetic it seems for the green side of the story. There's two more blokes on the interwebs that have a tendancy to rant on about such things; not just bikes and another bloke who's name I forgot (thankfully). I find it funny how they both rant on about how things are so much better in .nl as compared to the us where they both come from it seems. As a native .nl I do no share their opinion and even believe it to be down right propaganda at times, but I digress.

    Back to the induced demand story: What I have found most interesting is to see the period around the lock downs. Roads were REALLY empty back then. When things opened back up people were ridiculously careful and/or simply made use of the situation and used it as an excuse to stay away from the office. Traffic jams in the "between lock downs" were almost non existent. Then came the period that the word covid all of a sudden became an offense so we now simply have a "flu" season again (funny, I called covid the chinese flu from day 1 :P) and although much has been done to work more freely from home and I do appreciate that mind you, I find it mind boggling how the same roads have the same traffic jams all over again whilst there should in theory be a, what, 50% reduction in road use since working from home a couple of days per week IS the new norm? Admittedly, I have also heard from people that their bosses want them to come in, period. I guess to defend that overpriced office in the city centre where an IT-shop has no business being located in the first place.

    This to me seems to be evidence that roads are built to handle daytime traffic only and are never built to handle the peak hours, well, they are built for it where possible over here (longer on and off ramps to not hinder the flow of traffic to much) but not as a complete system to be able to handle traffic during the daily commute. The same also goes for public transport for that matter. I used to go by train when I was a poor student with free public transport (and have vowed never again since) and during the evening I could -never- get seating. The trains (which should really be called trams in .nl) were always packed more heavily than a meat truck.

    I guess this is "good use" of public money? On the other hand, if more lanes means more people start using a road and that that never ends, I guess that tells you all you need to know about public transport. It mostly can't and never will compete?

    Cheers,
    -P

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!