Thread: This is funny

Originally Posted by scrambler

Bushie, the uninstall/ conflict issue appears to be worse after uninstalling Wife 1.0. After some research I can confidently say that a completely new housing is required as, apparently, traces of Wife 1.0 can be detected in the physical environment. In addition, there are multiple conflicts associated with not only residual program traces but the POSSIBILITY of residual program traces. However to date none have caused the initiation of Nag Nag and in this case it would appear that clear evidence of an intention to upgrade to Wife 2.0 (rather than re-installing Wife 1.0) does reduce the number of error messages.

As you would be aware by now, Girlfriend is really a trialware version of Wife and the functionality differences between the two, and the marketing messages you mention, appear to differ between distributions. The Girlfriend 4.0 I've been playing with does not come with I/O port access enabled until upgraded (or perhaps I just haven't found the access codes yet) so I can't really compare the impact of conflict on I/O function. I do think attempting to use 2 I/O ports was always going to create conflicts.

I guess in the long run you either chose to put up with the adware or buy a license.

Good luck.

Steve

Caution my friends....

I have heard from tech support that excessive manual operation of the I/O tool on your laptop causes issues with monitor clarity.

Girlfriend 20.0 is overated as yet nothing compares to Girlfriend 1.0 but each to their own.

However the Nag Nag feature which has been the undoing of many a HARD DRIVE is able to be terminated at the source, with the introduction of the latest version of Shut the hell Up 1.0 or I'm sleeping with your best friend 6.9 both programs will require the user to be re-boot(ed) again and again.

If you are able to restore your operating system you may find the introduction of viruses such as Milkman 6.9 or Gym Instructor 1.01 either virus is terminal as the system will have been totally corrupted and warrent upgrading. There has been some talk of the use of ShotGun 12.0 to recitfiy the crash but the public server doesn't find this version compatable.


Also there has been reported cases of people using Pirated versions of wife 1.01 which are deemed unsafe as they often are unstable versions, not to mention their total incompatabilty with your current software i.e. Girlfriend 1.0 or Wife 1.0. If however you do decide to continue using the pirated copy of wife 1.01 may I suggest that you purchase some Virus protection programs which will stop the new program unexpected child processing error.


Cheers
Yabbie

Yabbie - ROFLMAO!

Very true.

Just a question

Has anyone any experience with Charasmatic cultleader V7.0 ?

I have heard this programme has a similar setup as seen in Priest 1.0 and the Guru programmes versions 1.0 - 9.0. Apparently it can simulaniously run multiple Wife and Girfriend style programmes without Nag Nag interferance. It also seems to have a similar tax offset as seen on Priest 1.0 but is less restrictive in the general operational setup.

Originally Posted by dobbo

Just a question

Has anyone any experience with Charasmatic cultleader V7.0 ?

I have heard this programme has a similar setup as seen in Priest 1.0 and the Guru programmes versions 1.0 - 9.0. Apparently it can simulaniously run multiple Wife and Girfriend style programmes without Nag Nag interferance. It also seems to have a similar tax offset as seen on Priest 1.0 but is less restrictive in the general operational setup.

I've no personal experience.

My Uncle for a time was running Wife 1.0 with Mistress 3.2 in the same environment. Had managed to operate a virtual system where Wife 1.0 saw Mistress 3.2 as a version of Boarder. What system mods were required to make Mistress 3.2 operate under those conditions I don't know, but eventually Wife 1.0 self-un-instaled and Mistress 3.2 was upgraded to Wife 2.0. I'm fairly confident there was other software running on other virtual machines (most commonly the virtual machines appeared on the System as Business programs) but none of these seem to have been continued past the free trial period.

The big difficulty with Charismatic Cult Leader 7.0 is the tendency for one of the Mistress installations to eventually access the Wireless Broadcasting software resulting in a security breach opening the network to public viewing.

Steve

Originally Posted by edddo

....having tried priest 1.0 for a few months I dont recommend it.

Tech support advises that the use of a parental control program be used where ever Priest 1.0 (catholic) as there has been previous interference issues, most resulting in severe truama to rear access programs.

Anyone having issues with Priest 1.0 interference should refer to the agent responsible, which will automatically convert the affected files to hidden files after the Un-install feature has been automated as there will be a file sharing issue.

Originally Posted by scrambler

I've no personal experience.

My Uncle for a time was running Wife 1.0 with Mistress 3.2 in the same environment. Had managed to operate a virtual system where Wife 1.0 saw Mistress 3.2 as a version of Boarder.

Steve

sounds like an early version of 'ALLO ALLO'.......

was your uncle french.....?

Originally Posted by DEFENDERZOOK

sounds like an early version of 'ALLO ALLO'.......

was your uncle french.....?

No. Do you think it would have worked better for him if he was?

Speaking of French...

A language instructor was explaining to her class that in French, nouns unlike their English counterparts, are grammatically designated as masculine or feminine.
"House," in French, is feminine-"la maison."
"Pencil," in French, is masculine-"le crayon."

One puzzled student asked, "What gender is computer?"

The teacher did not know, and the word wasn't in her French dictionary. So for fun she split the class into two groups appropriately enough, by gender and asked them to decide whether "computer" should be a masculine or feminine noun.

Both groups were required to give four reasons for their recommendation.

The men's group decided that computers should definitely be of the feminine gender ("la computer"), because:

1. No one but their creator understands their internal logic

2. The native languagethey use to communicate with other computers is incomprehensible to everyone else

3. Even the smallest mistakes are stored in long-term memory for possible later retrieval

4. As soon as you make a commitment to one, you find yourself spending half your pay check on accessories for it.

The women's group, however, concluded that computers should be masculine ("le computer"), because:

1. In order to get their attention, you have to turn them on;

2. They have a lot of data but they are still clueless

3. They are supposed to help you solve problems, but half the time they ARE the problem

4. As soon as you commit to one, you realize that if you'd waited a little longer, you could have gotten a better model.

I decided not to install Girlfriend 2.0 and bought a 2nd hand version of Wife 1.0. I find that any problems that arise can be erased by purchasing Landrover 1.0 to 10.0 in sequence and promising more of the same should the program play up It hasn't uninstalled yet.