Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 71

Thread: Land Rover, which one is best?- Your Opinion?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maryborough QLD
    Posts
    4,322
    Total Downloaded
    0
    One vehicle- Range Rover

    It was the best of all worlds and kept all happy to a degree. Comfort, great off-road ability and style you can't compare it to any other LR product. Plus it's really the vehicle that saved LR descending into **** even when it was the evil British Leyland days. This is why I always wanted one from childhood (also the old man owned one, didn't help either).

    Even today for a couple of grand and if you look hard enough you'll pick up a decent Rangie

    I like all LR's but the Rangie does it for me. Had a Discovery, wasn't for me. Drove a 'Fender, that bloody handbrake sticking in your leg always bings back memiories, hence why I didn't buy one. Freelander, well no low range is not for the Aquarangie IMO .

    My thoughts. Bag or praise all you like

    Trav

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    South Sydney
    Posts
    1,084
    Total Downloaded
    0
    For me it would be a 50th Anniversary V8 auto 90....awesome offroad and more comfy and easier to live with than your 'normal' Defender.

    Last of the Rangie 2 door (forget the environment, a heritage order should be placed on them to stop people from chopping them up before it is too late!!!

    I love the County 110 for a number of reasons....bloody strong, but it showed what some innovative thinking by JRA could produce -- a Landy which was directly made for the Australian market!

    LR UK could not produce a large capacity diesel, so that did not stop the locals, they just went and a got a Jap motor and produced one of the best 4wd on the planet.
    ____________________________
    Noddy
    - 'Kimba' ('02 Defender Xtreme 110)
    - 'Ari' (1994 Peugeot 205GTi Classic)

    "...we are all just earrings to the left of our parents, and they are all just haircuts to the left of theirs..."

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Wheelers Hill, Melbourne
    Posts
    4,085
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Here's my pennyworth,
    By best 4wd the emphasis should be on the 4wd part.
    Cannot agree with it being a SWB diesel, a strong headwind will put u in 3rd.It would rate better with more power for 4wd work
    Disco's and Rangie's in thier prime, would you really take 1 seriously off road unless you were a journalist?

    Having owned & driven series LWB & SWB,stage 1 v8 rangies (3) & Disco & now a County and in the beginning a series 1 - never owned it tho.
    I am torn between the series 1 swb - current ones lost a lot of ability with the extra weight- and what I drive now an '85 County.
    As I say, this is off road. I will say the first Rangies did a fantastic job, I will always remember seeing one at Mt Buller in the early 70's being absolutely caned by its owner -who must have been filthy rich-, getting up the metre deep in snow road to Arlberg Lodge, it was awesome.
    So its the County by a short nose imho.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maryborough QLD
    Posts
    4,322
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DeeJay
    Disco's and Rangie's in thier prime, would you really take 1 seriously off road unless you were a journalist?
    I would. No point having one and not using it

    Trav

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Dalby
    Posts
    4,011
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Mine

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,784
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by djam1
    Quote
    1998 defender 110 2.8 300tdi.

    There is no "logical" sense why the 4BD1 was better than the late model 300tdi's. How many armed forces around the world use Defenders? How many of those Defenders are fitted with 4BD1 compared to 300tdi?

    I think the 300tdi offer a more drivable, economical and more versatile Defender.

    How many armed forces in the world use 2.8 litre 300 tdi's NONE

    Land Rovers in the original form (pre 1986) were the toughest. I personally thik JDNSW is spot on Land Rovers went down hill significantly after this year even identical components were made from lesser materials (check Salisbury diffs once the disk brake models came in the component materials changed significantly)
    The 4BD1 was a real engine with the ability not only to perform but the ability to take severe punishment and wholesale abuse.
    Except the300TDI is only a 2.5 ltr not 2.8 !
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Sydney, Northern Beaches
    Posts
    917
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by loanrangie
    Except the300TDI is only a 2.5 ltr not 2.8 !
    The 2.5 was later rebored to a 2.8 and manufacturing was outsourced to South-America. Many (outside of AU) believe this was the best engine to make it's way into the Defender.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Sydney, Northern Beaches
    Posts
    917
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by djam1
    How many armed forces in the world use 2.8 litre 300 tdi's NONE.
    The 2.8 is still a 300tdi .. and 300tdi's are used in almost all military Defenders outside of Australia. Perhaps you should look past the brown land because there is a lot more 300tdi's going around than 4BD1.

    Where the Isuzu engine is preferred in AU, the 300tdi is the option in the rest of the world, incl. Africa which is far more unforgiving than AU. There is still a number of 300tdi's being built as the vehicle of choice in Africa, for armed forces, government agencies and private opretators. The 4BD1 was a tough as guts engine, but by no means the best to make it into a defender. Without a turbo, as they were released in AU they are no match for the 300tdi for drivability and performance. The 1998 300tdi and the rebored 2.8 had al it's issued ironed out after 6 years of production ... which leaves the question why didn't the 4BD1 remain in the AU Defenders? .. because it was old school!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by djam1
    The 4BD1 was a real engine with the ability not only to perform but the ability to take severe punishment and wholesale abuse.
    If it was so brilliant why didn't it make it into the Defender in other countries? It was a simplistic engine, old school that was easy to dismantle for transport .. that is why the AU military wanted them in their Defenders. Also, when a number of them were purchased by the military the 300tdi was not around, only the N.A Diesel and that was a no brainer.

    The Salisbury Diff you like to refer to was in the Defender up untill 2002 ... but I agree the County did have a tougher drive train than anything released today by LR .. but a tough drive train does not make a 4WD the best .. if that was the case the Nissan Patrol will win 4WDOTY every year!!!
    Last edited by Greylandy; 28th October 2006 at 11:31 AM.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    gosford
    Posts
    824
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My 2001 TD5 Auto ACE 7 Seat SLS. Does not excel in any one particular area.

    But for me does everything I need it to do really when and the best part is its a daily drive.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    399
    Total Downloaded
    0

    best rover

    hey JDNSW "The 90 misses out because this engine was never fitted to it, although a 90 with this engine would be hard to beat."

    OK not factory and with 12Psi


    small 2.JPG

    the old girls hard to beat!!

    P.S. toyo's and nissans hate my little princess!!

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!