Uhmm. Isn't hiding, defacing, obscuring your rego considered a no no by the fun police?
shorty.
On the A4WDM forum, this appeared http://www.4wdmonthly.com.au/forum/showthread.php't=24886
Originally Posted by blu125
There was a link to a thread on the Jeep forum but the thread has been deleted.
I don't know if any of us have really extreme mods but maybe blanking your rego no. may make sense.
There is, on that thread shown above, some correspondence between the protagonists.
Ron
Ron B.
VK2OTC
2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
2007 Yamaha XJR1300
Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA
RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever
Uhmm. Isn't hiding, defacing, obscuring your rego considered a no no by the fun police?
shorty.
He's only referring to posting photos on the forum I thinkOriginally Posted by shorty943
Thanks for the heads up Ron.![]()
Ah. Still appears as if some body considered it serious enough to report it to Transport.
Some times the safety of others must come before personal bents.
Of course you have the right to disagree.
shorty.
I have always hidden my rego number in online photos as well as anyone elses rego number if I post a pic of their car.
I have nothing to hide but it is one less piece of identifying info out there.
Good idea. Maybe it was something to do with the vehicles mods?
shorty.
Before jumping to conclusions does anyone know the nature of the mod's referred to on the forum in question? Who knows they may have been highly illegal?
That said I would think that just cause its a picture on the forum doesn't even mean its real now days. Have a look at my avatar... it's a 2 door 03MY Disco...no really it is, honest![]()
MY15 Discovery 4 SE SDV6
Past: 97 D1 Tdi, 03 D2a Td5, 08 Kimberley Kamper, 08 Defender 110 TDCi, 99 Defender 110 300Tdi[/SIZE]
My point exactly in my post above.Originally Posted by dm_td5
shorty.
I have long wondered if the special glass and associated electrickery used in instant darkening welding helmets could be used over number plates as a defence against revenue cameras. Any comments?
It may well be illegal, but there is no place in a democracy for governments to engage in covert surveillance of the citizens. Governments that do this should not be surprised when the citizens take steps to warn themselves of such surveillance and take steps to defeat such surveillance.
URSUSMAJOR
Don't know about point 1. but I'll fight by your side on point 2Originally Posted by Brian Hjelm
Any law that must be enforced by threat of punishment is corrupt and should not be entertained.
shorty.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks