Originally Posted by
nornalup
"A woodheater emits more pollution in a 24 hour period than a modern car does in it's entire lifetime"
Really:wasntme: Mabye we should look at the use of the word sustianable Frank, and get some perspective on the this.
A renewable resource means that the resource, in this case wood, can generate itself as fast as we use it. Given the time oil takes for mother nature to produce, and the rate we use it I think it's fair to say this became unsustainable soon after those texans tapped that first well. Using our forects for dunny paper aint sustianable, but collecting fallen timbber in selected areas I believe is a different story. Infact in WA it's used to actually controll the fuel load in areas, that otherwise would suffer more controlled burns by land managers.
For those of us, like frenchie, that live on large rural bush blocks we burn wood at a slower rate that that amount of bush produces and drops the stuff. As far as pollution from burning that wood I look at the burnt out trunks of 200 year old trees around our place and can only imagine my contribution a small part of what natural bushfires emit.
Living on the south coast of NSW how do you heat your place. Plug in the electric heater, or the gas bayonet. If so following your logic, do you make some coal or natural gas on the weekends in the back shed to make up for your sins.
Bottom line is going and chopping done a forest for woodchips is unsustainable. Having that forest intact and using it as a renewable resource makes sense. After all you don't cut done the lemon tree when a few are ripe do you?
Hopefully the blokes on this forum will chose to take wood in a responsible way and takes as much as they personally need. There are several areas around here that this has been going on for over a decade. They look in far better nick than the logged state forests and frequently burnt land surrounding.
Thats my rant for the night.