Thread: Which should come first, profit or protection?

Originally Posted by CraigE

Allan,
I deal with emergency situations, so it is quite often not possible to be explanatory or polite, but sharp and to the point when dealing with risk or lives. In training yes, time is permitted to explain how and why but not all the time. But yes you are correct about the message being lost, but this is usually from ignorance or arrogance being defensive not proactive. No body likes being told they are wrong, especially in public.

I accept that sometimes a split second is the difference between life and death in which case worrying about whether someone might be offended is inappropriate. However that is rarely the case when responding to a post on a forum.

Originally Posted by dirtdodger

Profit or Protection?
It has to be protection..................And if one needs to be as subtle as a sledgehammer to get the message across..........So be it.

I agree with Drivesafe.
.

I agree too with what Drivesafe says about electrical matters and a range of other subjects. Or more correctly my judgement is that what he says seems to match whatever knowledge I might have about the subject and is explained and justified in a way that I can understand, so I have no reason to question his recommendations.
I wholeheartedly agree that there are some messages that are very important to get across: sometimes they may be a lifesaving message.
I am trying to make the point that if the method you use to try to convey the message results in the message being lost, then you have failed.
As CraigE said no-one likes being told they are wrong in public, so they tend not to listen. I know that makes them ignorant, arrogant, illogical, immature and a whole lot of other things, but it doesn't alter the fact that the message was lost on them.
If you say something in a way that the listener doesn't understand or say it in such a way that they stop listening, you have wasted your time.
What is more important; saying that D***k is an idiot or having people understand what is wrong with his recommendation and how to avoid the problems it is likely to create?
I happen to think that the point Drivesafe was trying to make was so important that it was a great pity that his point seemed to get lost in all the other discussion.

I hope drivesafes warning doesn't fall on deaf ears....

My opinion? Reading thru it all, a bit heavy drivesafe, but I don't know the Derek person or his past - sounds like a 'consumer affairs - oh+s' type of issue...
re the 2nd battery installation question -
methinks that anyone supplying such 'equipment'
would have a 'duty of care' and may well be liable for many things if the vehicle actually burnt; like replacement of vehicle - and compensation for
all forms of inconvenience and other disaster - including loss of life.

However, given drivesafes warning, heavy or otherwise, none can take this type of installation too lightly.

GQ

Hi folks, for those of you who have not come across him, your lucky because he usually tries to take over what ever thread he is on so he can sell his wares.

The problem is, he has only been dealing in 12 volt automotive gear for about 18 months but to try to win customers over, he puts himself forward as an expert in the field when in fact a 1st year auto electrical apprentice, in his first week on the job will know more.

Derek pays to advertise on Exploreoz and I’m not trying interfere with his business but the way he posts what is, in many cases, nothing more than crap, is a case of buyer beware.

In this case if the buyer is not aware and not warned, the buyer could very well kill himself by taking notice of Derek’s drivel.

The irony is that I have seen him try his crap on other sites ( none of which he pays to advertise on ) and the members on the site have driven him off.

The last time that I know of was on Overland and the moderators never got a chance to shut him down, the other readers did it for them.

I’m not trying to justify how I treated him, he’s one of these creeps that thinks he can sneak a few freebies in on a site and because he’s Derek, he can get away with it. Boy has he been wrong.

Cheers and again, thanks for the support.

BTW, I posted a question for the moderator and his lack of a response shows he is obviously more interested in site profits.

DS, couldn't see a problem with what you were saying, as apposed to what Derek was recommending seems more directed at electrical than auto electrical.
Give em heaps
oh and they seem a bit soft on that site, wouldn't last 2 posts on somewhere like outerlimits.

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Good one Tim. Talk about throwing a lion amongst the pigeons.
When I'm after a dual battery system I'll come to you.
When I'm after a salesman I'll go to Derek.

Wair... I'm NEVER after a salesman.....

I'm with you drivesafe - having done plenty of audio installs including some with 5-6 batteries (true!) and understand totally where you are coming from on the technical end..... but some of the posts come across to an impartial reader as more playing the man than the ball.

IMHO, you could have made him look like a goose to all and sundry easily, by drawing him in and letting him hang himself with his misinformation.

I personally believe that you could have approached it differently for the sake of not making people cry, unfortunatly it does come across to a lamen that you have a vendetta against him. I do believe that Derek should be responsible for his actions and if he is advertising on the site and handing across information the can lead to malfunction, fire and death that he should be held liable on a criminal level. I also belive that the people running the site do have a duty of care that if they are condoning his advice for financial gain that they can be held liable if they have censored advise contradicting that of Derek that could have saved the life of the people receiving the information.
Oh and when it comes to saftey being nasty is sometimes the only way to get the message across

Wow! How many times do you see the "reaction" put on trial and judged - without any concern regarding the cause of the "reaction".

Drivesafe has reacted to what is basically fraud - and in a manner he is the one that has been put on trial. Glad to see that he is innocent

And of course the real culprit goes free - again. Read the papers - no, don't bother - this story is too frequent too rate a mention anymore.

Drivesafe, thankyou.

Speaking out against wrong is "unfashionable" - simply "not politically correct" as we must consider each other's opinions.

Bullsh*t

Wrong is wrong - so Drivesafe, thank you for your courage in speaking out against this wrong.

Let's hope Derek does not kill someone.