made perfect sense to me but you werent really pointing out that it was 4 wheel drive, just how the torque biasing (or lack thereof) worked.
from a wheels driving POV Technically yes.. but IMHO articualtion, driveline setup + tractive effort are what make a "real" four wheel drive rating any one of those by itself is pretty pointless (same as if you take one out of the equation) as they are all related to the overall motive effort picture.
Dave
"In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."
For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.
Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
TdiautoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)
If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.
There is another four wheel drive system everyone seems to have forgotten - full time four wheel drive with a (lockable)free wheel in the front drive. Used by Landrover from 1948-50. It is actually difficult to see why it has not been used more often - the drawback of not working in reverse could be solved these days by automatic locking when you engage reverse.
John
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks