Originally Posted by
feraldisco
Simpler, less cramped engine layouts would be good. Too often engineers design things (not just cars) without any thought to how easy something is going to be to service/repair. This is a source of frustration for home mechanics and adds significantly to the cost if outsourcing as items often need to be removed to get to things that need to be repaired (the D2 Td5 engine bay was definitely designed by someone with a sense of humour) - and worse, many mechanics just don't want to work on these things! I couldn't believe it when it took a mechanic 5 hours to replace the ECU harness on my D2 Td5 - I was expecting about an hour! [Don't get me started on the fact that virtually every example of the Td5 has had to replace injector/ECU harness without any assistance from LR due to oil ingress resulting from fundamentally poor design]
I realise it's trendy to build things with a minimum of fasteners showing; however, for a utilitarian vehicle such as 4WDs, I think most owners would be comfortable with exposed fasteners and a modular/logical way of taking things apart with common tools. Not only would this make access easier for repairs, but it would also mean that small faulty parts could be replaced rather than having to replace a large integrated unit at considerable expense.
Some people will say that all modern vehicles are like this, but the current Hilux is a good example of a vehicle which has a modern frugal, powerful TD, but an engine bay that is still easy to work in. Toyota operate on the KISS principle which LR seem to pay scant reference to... Despite this, we continue to drive LRs because they have great ambience and are very capable on and off road...when they are working :(