Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: Nissan Patrol Zd30

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    in the wild New England, NSW
    Posts
    4,918
    Total Downloaded
    0

    nissan engine performance / reliability

    the little experience I've had with the nissan diesels indicated to me, at least, that the 4.2 td would be more than adequate for anything i would want....

    over extensive mileages I've found the petrol car motors (eg. VG33) to be very reliable and relatively cheap to run

    and I like landrovers 'cause they are interesting ... not 'cause they are reliable

    I couldn't in my wildest imaginings call a nissan or toyo interesting

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Launceston, TAS
    Posts
    853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    And the 4.2 Patrol runs the same injection pump as the 300tdi I believe so no doubt a decent diesel tuner could make a big difference

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,147
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Greylandy View Post
    I agree .. I looked long and hard at a 4.2TD Patrol. They are top units and are indestructible .. in stark contrast to the ZD30
    Yup, thats the only motor that I would consider also.

    That bloke is obviously a bit sensitive! Mind you he doesn't deserve an answer after his disgraceful reply, and probably wont get one.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    brisbane
    Posts
    155
    Total Downloaded
    0
    A friend of mine who we do a lot of travelling with has a 4.2 td. It is a solid engine with good torque for towing although does tend to overheat up ranges and only gets around 7 kms/l normal driving. The rear door cracked at the base of the window which was replaced by Nissan with the owner just paying to have it painted. He is going back to Toyo for his next car. Apart from those things, it's been a pretty good car.
    Tony

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rovercare View Post
    Interesting information BUT, the TD42 factory turboes, need only pump adjustments to make it rocket along and are solid as a rock

    Also the 3l CRD is good for about 13l/100, bloke at work has one....................we're just waiting till it blows up
    Yep, TD42 and TD42T are legendary for reliability. Dead simple design and a 3" exhaust transforms them. The pump adjustments are as easy as a Tdi.

    I'm convinced the cooling issues are an airflow problem, as a simple add of silicone to the fan clutch generally fixes the problem.

    Yeah, it'll be intersting to see if they've addressed the reliabilty issues of the ZD30 on the new 3.0 CRD engine.
    I know a few blokes that work in the mines around here that grabbed the last of the TD42T's before they disappeared. (and almost universally fitted 3" exhausts)

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Williams West Aust
    Posts
    20,998
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Them Pootrols are legindary!!!!!
    The OTHER grader driver at work has one.
    First beach fishing trip "I didnt need to air down or lock the hubs(automatic arent they??),2wd everywhere mate" EVERYONE ELSE WAS GETTING BOGGED!!!
    FUEL ECONOMY,"mate that big 4.8 petrol would suck harder than Linda Lovelace" "no its real good,I get 10lts/ 100km going easy,push it hard I get 15lts/100ks"
    We allready had him down as a compulsive lier before he bought it!!! DESERVERED 4.8 pootrol pilot!!!
    Andrew
    DISCOVERY IS TO BE DISOWNED
    Midlife Crisis.Im going to get stuck into mine early and ENJOY it.
    Snow White MY14 TDV6 D4
    Alotta Fagina MY14 CAT 12M Motor Grader
    2003 Stacer 525 Sea Master Sport
    I made the 1 millionth AULRO post

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Toowoomba QLD
    Posts
    1,132
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've had several 4.2 Diesel Patrols. My last one had 550,000 km on the clock when I sold it and is still going strong today. Yes, they are old technology and it was no rocket but it still went better than a 300TDI with way more bottom end torque. They are built to last with dual oil and air filters. The gearboxes are fantastic and put the best Land Rover gearboxes to shame. No clunks, no whines, nothing ever breaks. The diffs and axles are virtually indestructible and the LSD stays tight indefinitly. They were the most capable, reliable and dependable vehicles I've ever owned.

    Yes, some of the other engine options were less than wonderful, but dont be too quick to criticise.............

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    canberra
    Posts
    3,002
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mark2 View Post
    but it still went better than a 300TDI with way more bottom end torque.
    4.2 na has allmost identical power and torque to the 300tdi so no i wouldent realy call it outstanding for its size

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    still far superior to a 300Tdi off idle. The TD42T isn't quite as good at idle as the NA version, but a pump tweak can fix that.

    Fuel economy, wellllllll.
    My tweaked Tdi in a heavy 130 with a load flogs a stock GU 4.2TD Patrol empty, and gets better fuel economy to boot, but I still wish I had the off idle torque of the Pootrol. Can't beat displacement.

    Mark, the later TD42's (GU's ) don't have the dual air filters, which is dumb. The air cleaner is a smaller than a 300Tdi now, which shows that Land Rover hasn't cornered the market on cheque book engineering.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Adelaide Hills
    Posts
    183
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by tempestv8 View Post
    Nissan haven't had a decent engine in the Patrol for a long long time now. Very sad state of affairs.

    4.2 litre petrol was thirsty and the current 4.8 litre petrol has even more ferocious thirst.

    4.2 diesel a slug and the 4.2 TD is a bit lethargic still, unless big ticket mods are fitted. Even then, cooling the beast remains a challenge.

    2.8 litre turbo diesel a bit too small and puny. Cracked heads can happen.

    3.0 litre Nissan Skyline engine OK, but not good for towing.

    3.0 litre ZD30 melts pistons despite the later "fixes"

    The latest 3.0 CRD is very thirsty, which is quite surprising.

    What's up with Nissan?

    What's up with Nissan? Anyone who turned out cars like the Datsun 120y/180B, Sunny, Pintara, Bluebird, didn't deserve to last. With debts of about $14 billion many years ago they were bought by Renault. Had a mate with an early Patrol diesel(1982?) wot a dog of a vehicle. Glad I bought an old Rangie then and not one of them. Why don't they get better?? Don't let any Patrol drivers pick on your Landy

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!