Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 73

Thread: Embarrassed by your spelling?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Highlands NSW
    Posts
    957
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Why do we think spelling is 'set in concrete' as it were? As long as we don't start spelling like the septic tanks we're right.....

    Try this:

    Whan that Aprill, with his shoures soote
    The droghte of March hath perced to the roote
    And bathed every veyne in swich licour,
    Of which vertu engendred is the flour;
    5 Whan Zephirus eek with his sweete breeth
    Inspired hath in every holt and heeth
    The tendre croppes, and the yonge sonne
    Hath in the Ram his halfe cours yronne,
    And smale foweles maken melodye,
    10 That slepen al the nyght with open eye-
    (So priketh hem Nature in hir corages);
    Thanne longen folk to goon on pilgrimages
    And palmeres for to seken straunge strondes
    To ferne halwes, kowthe in sondry londes;
    15 And specially from every shires ende
    Of Engelond, to Caunterbury they wende,
    The hooly blisful martir for to seke
    That hem hath holpen, whan that they were seeke.
    2010 110 Crew Cab Deefa
    Mittagong NSW 2575

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Toowoomba
    Posts
    6,151
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I think there are spelling mistakes....and then there are spelling mistakes. The odd word here or there is one thing versus a whole dialogue of spelling and grammatical errors that makes it pointless to read. How important is it? I would think it is pretty bloody important. When I was hiring people, if I came across a resume littered with spelling mistakes it got binned straight away. My 11 yr old can spell, so if someone in their mid 20's can't there is a problem. Reading, writing and arithmetic are the very basic's of education, it shouldn't be that hard...should it?

    Is it the be all and end all.......of course not.....my old man sends me emails every now and then that do my head in because of the errors in spelling and grammar and trying to decipher what he is saying. Being a multi millionaire, maybe he can get away with it ,

    Regards

    Stevo

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Tumbi Umbi, Central Coast, NSW
    Posts
    5,768
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by George130 View Post
    Those of us who know we can't spell just live with it. I used to get asked why I didn't use a dictionary. Simple answere is if you can't spell then you can't use a dictionary. I also know my writting skills will always be sub par.
    I don't want to re-open the whole debate about the importance of spelling.
    It was debated fairly comprehensively in October last year, complete with a poll on the subject.
    To Spell or not to Spell :-)

    I just want to make the point that the claim so often heard that you can't look a word up in the dictionary if you can't spell it is usually a cop out.

    It may be true in some cases such as "xylophone", "dauphin" or "yacht", but most of the time a fairly quick search would locate the word easily enough.

    The word in the title which apparently caused some difficulty is commonly written incorrectly and is a fairly typical example.
    Surely there are only a few possibilities: embaras, embarras, embarras, or possible even embaris.
    Look up any one of those possibilities in the dictionary and you will be so close on the page to the correct spelling that you could hardly miss it.

    Even if there are a lot of words that are hard to look up if you can't spell them, there are an enormous number that could be found quite easily. I will concede that there are some words you can't find if you can't spell them, but it is certainly not universally true.

    BTW George130, your post is easy to read.

    That has little to do with how good your spelling is. It is because unlike some other people, You know when to put in a full stop and start a new sentence.

    Being able to write in short clear sentences and also in short paragraphs has little to do with your level of education. How hard can it be to bung in a full stop after each statement and start a new sentence or a new paragraph?

    If someone who claims to have sub par writting skills can do it surely everyone can.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The POINT of this thread was just to let people know about a freeware spell checker. The point WAS NOT to start the whole spelling debate again. Bloody thread hijackers

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Tumbi Umbi, Central Coast, NSW
    Posts
    5,768
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by WhiteD3 View Post
    The POINT of this thread was just to let people know about a freeware spell checker. The point WAS NOT to start the whole spelling debate again. Bloody thread hijackers
    I thought it had already served its purpose admirably.

    The poor unfortunates who are stuck with IE had found out about a freeware spell checker.

    A few enlightened (but apparently not fully informed) users of FF found out about the Australian Dictionary add-on.

    So I thought as the thread had served its original purpose and one extra purpose it was fair game for those who had a mind to hijack it.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Avonside NSW
    Posts
    245
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Spelling is over rated.

    Went to a public school and cant spell for... well not much. only need to remember alkanes have single bonds, alkenes have double bonds and alkynes have triple bonds or is that alkenes have single bonds....bugger

    now if i put this ether near this flame

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yass NSW
    Posts
    7,239
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by vnx205 View Post
    I don't want to re-open the whole debate about the importance of spelling.
    It was debated fairly comprehensively in October last year, complete with a poll on the subject.
    To Spell or not to Spell :-)

    I just want to make the point that the claim so often heard that you can't look a word up in the dictionary if you can't spell it is usually a cop out.

    It may be true in some cases such as "xylophone", "dauphin" or "yacht", but most of the time a fairly quick search would locate the word easily enough.

    The word in the title which apparently caused some difficulty is commonly written incorrectly and is a fairly typical example.
    Surely there are only a few possibilities: embaras, embarras, embarras, or possible even embaris.
    Look up any one of those possibilities in the dictionary and you will be so close on the page to the correct spelling that you could hardly miss it.

    Even if there are a lot of words that are hard to look up if you can't spell them, there are an enormous number that could be found quite easily. I will concede that there are some words you can't find if you can't spell them, but it is certainly not universally true.

    BTW George130, your post is easy to read.

    That has little to do with how good your spelling is. It is because unlike some other people, You know when to put in a full stop and start a new sentence.

    Being able to write in short clear sentences and also in short paragraphs has little to do with your level of education. How hard can it be to bung in a full stop after each statement and start a new sentence or a new paragraph?

    If someone who claims to have sub par writting skills can do it surely everyone can.
    I'm surprised my grammar is even remotly correct. I only begon to understand grammar at the end of year 12.
    As for spelling. I am dislexic. My records and tests are what was used in the ACT to creat the standards for recognising someone with a learning disability as by year 12 I could no longer hide it.
    After a lot of extra coaching I was told I will never spell correctly unles I can loose the ability to read and write and start from scratch.
    I still try to get it right in the first place but I cannot see my own mistakes and only see obviouse mistakes in others.
    On the plus side I am very good at interpreting what is supposed to be there. A lot of the more dificult words I know is because I spent weeks learning the word and sayings to get the letters correct.
    I can't even read my own hand writting after 6-12 months so have to type or memorise things I need to know.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    On The Road
    Posts
    30,031
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I never have a problem understanding anything you write Edd.
    "How long since you've visited The Good Oil?"

    '93 V8 Rossi
    '97 to '07. sold.
    '01 V8 D2
    '06 to 10. written off.
    '03 4.6 V8 HSE D2a with Tornado ECM
    '10 to '21
    '16.5 RRS SDV8
    '21 to Infinity and Beyond!


    1988 Isuzu Bus. V10 15L NA Diesel
    Home is where you park it..

    [IMG][/IMG]

  9. #39
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    459
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The following indicates limitations of using spelling checkers. Try it through yours.
    Since they came into apparently common use I have noticed that most of the spelling mistakes in newspapers are the sort spelling checkers do not pick up.

    GET IT WRITE!

    I have a spelling chequer
    It came with my Pea See
    It plane lee marques four my revue
    Miss steaks eye can knot sea.

    When aye strike the quays and right a whirred
    Eye weight fore it too say
    Weather eye am write or wrong
    It tells me rite aweigh.

    Whenever a mist ache is maid
    It nose bee four two late
    It tells me watt eye rote is floored
    Its rear lee, rear lee grate!

    I've run this pome write threw it
    I'm shore yore pleased two no
    Its let a perfect in its weigh
    My chequer tolled me sew

    - Sauce unknown

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Tumbi Umbi, Central Coast, NSW
    Posts
    5,768
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by George130 View Post
    I'm surprised my grammar is even remotly correct. I only begon to understand grammar at the end of year 12.
    As for spelling. I am dislexic. My records and tests are what was used in the ACT to creat the standards for recognising someone with a learning disability as by year 12 I could no longer hide it.
    After a lot of extra coaching I was told I will never spell correctly unles I can loose the ability to read and write and start from scratch.
    I still try to get it right in the first place but I cannot see my own mistakes and only see obviouse mistakes in others.
    On the plus side I am very good at interpreting what is supposed to be there. A lot of the more dificult words I know is because I spent weeks learning the word and sayings to get the letters correct.
    I can't even read my own hand writting after 6-12 months so have to type or memorise things I need to know.
    I am both fascinated and impressed by your story.
    You should be proud of the effort you have made and what you have achieved.

    It does make you wonder though about some of those other people who just throw up their hands and say, "I'm not a good speller and I never will be, so I'm not even going to try."

Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!