I don't want to re-open the whole debate about the importance of spelling.
It was debated fairly comprehensively in October last year, complete with a poll on the subject.
To Spell or not to Spell :-)
I just want to make the point that the claim so often heard that you can't look a word up in the dictionary if you can't spell it is usually a cop out.
It may be true in some cases such as "xylophone", "dauphin" or "yacht", but most of the time a fairly quick search would locate the word easily enough.
The word in the title which apparently caused some difficulty is commonly written incorrectly and is a fairly typical example.
Surely there are only a few possibilities: embaras, embarras, embarras, or possible even embaris.
Look up any one of those possibilities in the dictionary and you will be so close on the page to the correct spelling that you could hardly miss it.
Even if there are a lot of words that are hard to look up if you can't spell them, there are an enormous number that could be found quite easily. I will concede that there are some words you can't find if you can't spell them, but it is certainly not universally true.
BTW George130, your post is easy to read.
That has little to do with how good your spelling is. It is because unlike some other people, You know when to put in a full stop and start a new sentence.
Being able to write in short clear sentences and also in short paragraphs has little to do with your level of education. How hard can it be to bung in a full stop after each statement and start a new sentence or a new paragraph?
If someone who claims to have sub par writting skills can do it surely everyone can.

Bookmarks