Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 51

Thread: How often do you "upgrade" cars?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    VIC
    Posts
    3,536
    Total Downloaded
    0

    How often do you "upgrade" cars?

    I was chatting to a rather dippy lady over lunch today, she was saying that her son needs to buy a new car because his current one is "completely worn out, it's old, done 100,000 km". I also know quite a few people who buy new cars every three years, and some of our neighbours are tragic, as soon as a new ad comes on TV you can bet your backside it'll be in their driveway within a week.

    It seems there's two schools of thought - buying [usually leasing] new cars every few years or running your car into the ground before buying a new one. I reckon it makes more sense financially to run a car into the ground altogether.

    How long do you anticipate you'll keep your LRs?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Yorkshire, UK
    Posts
    447
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by B92 8NW View Post
    I was chatting to a rather dippy lady over lunch today, she was saying that her son needs to buy a new car because his current one is "completely worn out, it's old, done 100,000 km". I also know quite a few people who buy new cars every three years, and some of our neighbours are tragic, as soon as a new ad comes on TV you can bet your backside it'll be in their driveway within a week.

    It seems there's two schools of thought - buying [usually leasing] new cars every few years or running your car into the ground before buying a new one. I reckon it makes more sense financially to run a car into the ground altogether.

    How long do you anticipate you'll keep your LRs?
    Where I used to live, one of the neighbours changed their car everytime the age related plates changed. Since in UK that is every 6 months it must have cost a fortune! Anything to be one step ahead of the neighbours I suppose!


    The 110 was bought in 1997 when it was 12 months old.

    The hybrid in 2003 and the D2 in 2006.

    Barring MAJOR accidents can not see any of them going in next 5 - 10 years

    Regards

    Brendan
    Last edited by leeds; 25th December 2008 at 10:38 PM. Reason: correcting spelling

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Minchinbury NSW
    Posts
    1,032
    Total Downloaded
    0
    use to be every year, 2 years tops since the little one came into the world 4 years ago and two morgages and all the money spent on my D2 im keeping till it becomes antique

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    1,746
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Well im new to owning cars compared to you guys!

    Iv had my Range Rover since i was 16 so almost 3 years its a 84 but has been in the family for 10 years (dad gave it too me!)

    And i bought Grover the 98 Disco Tdi on the 24th of April 2007, and id like to think i will be keeping both for a very VERY long time couldn't imagine selling them!

    A family friend bought his series LR off the show room floor and still has it over 35 years later he has promised when he can no longer drive it its mine

  5. #5
    slug_burner is offline TopicToaster Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,024
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It depends on how you do the figures. I am sure that there are accountants that can make a case for either holding on to cars or for turning them over every two or three years. I think it comes down to if you want to drive around in a fairly new car all the time then you will justify turning them over frequently. I have never felt in the position to buy a new car so have stuck to second hand ones and have tended to hold onto them.

    Perhaps with some tax advantages it might work out in favour of turning them over more frequently. However I do not believe that it is a sustainable practise. I do not believe we should all be driving around in old cars like they do in Cuba but I think that we should think about the amount of energy that it takes to build a car and see if we would get a better return by building a vehicle that will last a little longer before falling apart. Maybe that is why series LRs have been so popular.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,455
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Well, Although I have not owned that many I tend to keep them for about 200,000kms. I'm changing Landys in 6 months and once I have it I won't be changing vehicles until either it falls apart OR the main fuel we use changes.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    South Yundreup,WA.
    Posts
    7,468
    Total Downloaded
    0
    All depends. If you can write it off on tax then it would be beneficial to change often, but for most of us they are a money pit. As much as I would like a new 4x4 cant see it happening for 5 yrs at least. On average we buy a car (not new) every 4 years. Only had one new car and that was the Tdi Disco. Buy one used is our motto most times. Nice to have a new car but the immediate losses are too much. We bought the Stato for $31k (half new price) early 2007 only 3 1/2 years old and that will do us for a bit.
    2011 Discovery 4 TDV6
    2009 DRZ400E Suzuki
    1956 & 1961 P4 Rover (project)
    1976 SS Torana (project - all cash donations or parts accepted)
    2003 WK Holden Statesman
    Departed
    2000 Defender Extreme: Shrek (but only to son)
    84 RR (Gone) 97 Tdi Disco (Gone)
    98 Ducati 900SS Gone & Missed

    Facta Non Verba

  8. #8
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is offline Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,713
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    I drove my Hillman Hunter (bought new in 1971) for over 30 years then my son got it. It was given away earlier this year.

    Would you believe I have the owner's handbook in front of me - I'm posting it off to the new owner.

    Body no. 1220
    Engine No. B043905624
    Delivery Date: 1/9/1971
    John Theaker Motors
    Carnarvon, WA

    Now to sell the 1963 Hillman Super Minx.
    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    South Yundreup,WA.
    Posts
    7,468
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by p38arover View Post
    I drove my Hillman Hunter (bought new in 1971) for over 30 years then my son got it. It was given away earlier this year.

    Would you believe I have the owner's handbook in front of me - I'm posting it off to the new owner.

    Body no. 1220
    Engine No. B043905624
    Delivery Date: 1/9/1971
    John Theaker Motors
    Carnarvon, WA

    Now to sell the 1963 Hillman Super Minx.
    Grew up in a 1960s Hillman Hunter wagon. My Grandfather had it from new until he died.
    2011 Discovery 4 TDV6
    2009 DRZ400E Suzuki
    1956 & 1961 P4 Rover (project)
    1976 SS Torana (project - all cash donations or parts accepted)
    2003 WK Holden Statesman
    Departed
    2000 Defender Extreme: Shrek (but only to son)
    84 RR (Gone) 97 Tdi Disco (Gone)
    98 Ducati 900SS Gone & Missed

    Facta Non Verba

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Boonah, QLD
    Posts
    778
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Why replace something if it's not broken/still working fine?

    I heard some arbitary figure that (for example) if it takes 5 years to design & build a new car (eg VE commondoor) more energy/greenhouse gas would be used/produced in developing the new car then all the cars sold in the 5 years it took to develope a NEW car.

    Therefore... We should have all stayed with our Series LRs or Kingswoods as every time you make a new car (design & develope) it costs alot of resources. However saying that some things would need to be developed such as engines to keep polution down from the older engine design. Otherwise there is not much point developing newer cars... don't see how they can get much safer than they already are... I would certianly back my Kingswood or Series IIA over a current model buzz-box any day

    After wading through all that rubbish :P... Don't upgrade as you are hurting the enviroment because of the resources used to develope NEW cars.

    Plus all new cars look ugly - Give me a Series Rover or a Kingswod any way

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!