The New MN Triton.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pedro_The_Swift

sigh,,
try and do a nice thing,,:(

---

Ignore!
They only want a bite:D You'll catch them out some day I'm sure.

someone gotta do the straightman's job,,,,;):D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mikesolo

We have one too. But it will not go, where our Land Rovers go. It is all nice inside with lots of gadgets.

---

Seen quite a few in my last two visits to Sydney. You can pick them in the car parks with that long tray sticking out 200mm past everything else:D
Yours auto or manual and what spec?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pedro_The_Swift

someone gotta do the straightman's job,,,,;):D

---

I'm not gaim to do it now,might make to many typoes and bad grammar;) Oh well, bugger it who really cares anyway.
Cld txt it 4 U :angel:

They are one of the ugliest cars on the road.

This is how they usually end up when they go off road - they need a Mitsu****ty Tritoo recovery vehicle to accompany them.

https://www.aulro.com/afvb/

Garry

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by garrycol

They are one of the ugliest cars on the road.

This is how they usually end up when they go off road - they need a Mitsu****ty Tritoo recovery vehicle to accompany them.

http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...os21NOV092.jpg

Garry

---

I already have the best looking and the most capable off road vehicles ever built.... The RRC and the 120":p

That's why mine has 32" tyres fitted. Still not much use for any severe off road though due to lack of long travel suspension and the huge rear over hang. But a lot better than a car;)
Seems to plow through this black mud here no worries.

Actually that is my brothers Tritoo - nothing like a bit of sibling rivalry:D.

It is the older 3.2 engine which is a gem with the factory upgrades to the ecu. It goes really well on the sand (just the goose driving was a worry) and generally does pretty well everywhere else as long as great ground clearance is not required. His front "heavy duty" bash plate did get damaged by the sand on this trip:o.

I am not sure why Mitsubishi changed to the new 2.5 litre engine but reports are it is good - would have to be extra good to be better than the old one.

They are still butt ugly though - not like my 101.:)

Garry

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rangier Rover

I'm not gaim to do it now,might make to many typoes and bad grammar;) Oh well, bugger it who really cares anyway.
Cld txt it 4 U :angel:

---

OK, I wont correct anything here then. :D Actually there are only three mistakes, so not too bad.;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by numpty

OK, I wont correct anything here then. :D Actually there are only three mistakes, so not too bad.;)

---

To be honest with you, I have NFI on how to text:D Better leave it to the kids huh:angel:

I'd volunteer a review but it'd start to sound like a porno.

Without getting into auto v manual debate, why the manual Tony?