In the above post I said that the 18th Dynasty Pharoah Tutankamen died around 950AD. Conventional archeology says Tutankhamen died around 1350BC. But way too many Archeologists who think outside the square realise that 95OAD is more likely the correct date as all Archeological evidence fits that earlier date, hence the conventional date is impossible.
For example, 19th Dynasty Pharoah Ramses III [somewhere around 1300AD in conventional thinking with out looking up the exact date] built a temple that had tiles imported into Egypt. These tiles had Greek alphabet letters on the back of them to show the builders how these ancient tiles were to be placed. Scholars know the Greek alphabet was invented around 900BC. So Pharoah Ramses III could not have ruled in 1300BC. Hence many thinking Archeologists accept the Revised Chronology
That Revised Chronology now puts the Bible exodus under Moses, at the End of the 13th Dynasty, and we find that so much archeology evidence now fits in with the Bible account of the exodus. But if the wrong dating of the 18th & 19th Dynasty was correct the Bible account of the exodus is a myth, because absolutely all 18th and 19th Dynasty facts would prove everything in the Bible's exodus account is wrong. Correctly dating the exodus to the 13th dynasty makes the Bible account of the exodus fit in with all the historical facts. And some of what is recorded in the Bible is now found recorded in ancient Egyptian inscriptions when we put the exodus in theright place in Egyptian History.


Reply With Quote



Bookmarks