Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 34 of 34

Thread: Land Rover Based ?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Seaforth NSW
    Posts
    933
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Tata - Iveco

    Quote Originally Posted by Sleepy View Post
    Reading all this makes me wonder what Tata will do with the Defender. They gotta be planning something

    Tata has it's own range of 4wd utility vehicles - perhaps they will combine a new model? Would that be a "Defata"?
    Maybe the "Defeater" - think positive

    This is in the pipeline:
    Tata Motors - Media Centre
    Iveco and Tata explore strategic alliance opportunities

    Admittedly a couple of years old but who knows - an Iveco engine and a back to basics rear wheel drive, leaf sprung wide rear door and floor, flat floor with suspension seats bolted through to the chassis, maybe a wider body instead of silly eyebrows - list goes on. The Santana (now Iveco) was already developing along those lines.
    Don't forget they had parabolic springs, disc brakes before the 110 as well as the wind up windows, etc already referred to by Ben.

    Bob

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
    Land Rover actually helped Santana develop the six but weren't interested themselves as they had a 3.5 V8 petrol, and the market wasn't there for a 3.4 litre diesel in Europe. They later had project Iceberg, to make a 3.5 alloy V8 diesel, so probably not interested in the 3.4 diesel for that reason too.

    Jeff

    Good points - however the iceberg was a spectacular failure by all accounts (possibly ahead of its time though?).

    The fact that LR and Perkins were developing the iceberg proves there was a market there and they were interested in a larger diesel. They could have saved a lot of money and used the 3.4.

  3. #33
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,521
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    Good points - however the iceberg was a spectacular failure by all accounts (possibly ahead of its time though?).

    The fact that LR and Perkins were developing the iceberg proves there was a market there and they were interested in a larger diesel. They could have saved a lot of money and used the 3.4.
    The Iceberg was a failure, but I don't know that spectacular is the right word. I'm not sure why it was abandoned exactly, or what vehicle it was intended for (Rangerover?) - perhaps the fact that this was unclear contributed to its demise.

    The attraction of the Rover V8 was that it was lighter than the 2.25 petrol - and the diesel version of it probably would have been lighter than the 2.25 diesel, which the 3.4 certainly would not have been - it would have been 50% heavier.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Northern Beaches
    Posts
    1,426
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    I'm not sure why it was abandoned exactly, or what vehicle it was intended for (Rangerover?) - perhaps the fact that this was unclear contributed to its demise.
    Perhaps the Llama or other 101 replacements.

    Jeff


Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!