
 Originally Posted by 
theresanothersteve
					 
				 
				I think there is a misconception here...
 
GPS recievers can return a fix from 3 satelitites, but 'guess' the elevation.
In guessing the elevation, they are also, to a certain extent,  guessing the lat/long.
  
To give an accurate fix they require 4.
Isn't that what I said? 
 
Ideally the satelites need to be evenly scattered in the sky, the closer the satelites are together, the less accurate the positioning.
Isn't that what I said?
 
More satelites does not mean a more accurate positioning, the GPS unit only uses 4. More satelites increases the likelihood of a more accurate position as it gives the receiver a wider choice of satelites!
So, the GPS receiver is using more satellites in order to decide which ones to use at each update.
 
GPS units that receive a correction from a ground station broadcasting from a known location are great, except the further you are from the ground station, the less reliable the correction. After a couple of hundred kilometres they are no more accurate than a normal commercial unit.
I didn't mention DGPS!  It isn't available with his gps receiver.
 
You either have to spend up big, or put up with accuracy of about +- 10 metres. I reckon I can see what I'm looking for from 10 metres away, so I'm very happy with commercial GPS!
That is the quoted figure, but with increasing Nos. of satellites, it is somewhat less in practice.
			
		 
	
Bookmarks